The physical toll of SNL is well-established

NBC
Samberg noted that nobody on the show was surprised when he explained why he was leaving. As he explained: “Everyone was like, ‘Oh, same.’ No one was like, ‘What?’ Everyone was like, ‘Oh, yes, this is just what happens.’ Like, you hit a wall. We’re not built to operate that way.”
Bill Hader, who was cast on “SNL” the same year as Samberg and stayed one year after him, has expressed similar sentiments. “When I was on ‘SNL,’ I was a bit of a basket case,” Hader told Variety in 2019. “It could not have been easy on my wife at the time. I was so consumed with work and anxiety. Sometimes I felt like people thought, ‘Oh, he’s just wanting attention or something.’ It was like, ‘No, man, I’m legit. I’m freaking out right now.'”
In the show’s 50th anniversary special this year, Samberg even made a whole music video about how “everyone” at “Saturday Night Live” has anxiety, and how basically every week on the show is a nonstop struggle with IBS for the cast and crew. It seems like the only one on “SNL” who doesn’t have anxiety is Kenan Thompson, who’s comfortably sailing into his 23rd season without breaking a sweat.
[embedded content]
What has Samberg done in his post-SNL career?

NBC
While some “Saturdat Night Live” cast members fade into obscurity when they leave the series, Andy Samberg has stayed relevant. Throughout the late 2010s he was best known for his lead role of Jake Peralta on “Brooklyn Nine-Nine,” a Michael Schur-created sitcom that went on for eight seasons despite spotty ratings. His Peralta performance proved that Samberg could handle dramatic material; season 5’s “The Box” was so memorable because it was so grounded and intense. It’s hard to believe the guy behind “D**k in a Box” could pull off an interrogation scene this riveting.
Admittedly, not all of Samberg’s post-“SNL” projects have been a huge success. His 2016 film “Popstar: Never Stop Never Stopping,” drew mediocre results at the box office despite its positive critical response. Luckily the movie has experienced a bit of a resurgence in recent months, thanks in part to it joining Netflix’s library, and also the growing popularity of “The Lonely Island and Seth Meyers” podcast. People today feel much more nostalgic for “The Lonely Island” than they did in 2016, so they’re more willing to give “Popstar” the chance it always deserved.
Today, Samberg looks back on his “SNL” time fondly, even if he can’t always remember it that well. It’s a running joke on the “Lonely Island and Seth Meyers” podcast that he forgets so many of the details of the shorts and sketches he made, even if the details are so bizarre you’d think they’d be impossible to forget. So much was going on at “SNL” each week that it was impossible for Samberg to remember everything, let alone stave off the burnout. We wish he could’ve stayed on longer, but the more we learn about the demanding behind-the-scenes “SNL” production schedule, we’re just glad he held out as long as he could.
by admin | Jun 29, 2025 | TV & Beyond Articles
This dream came true in 1971 with the cult classic “Duel,” a frenetic story about a traveling salesman and a diabolical truck, encapsulating Spielberg’s raw talent as a storyteller. The success of “Duel” put him on the map, but it wasn’t enough to fund the things he wanted to work on. Although Spielberg wanted to gradually move away from making teleplays and television movies, he had no choice but to dabble in this world to garner more credibility (while having limited artistic freedom). A string of half-hearted attempts mark this period, including 1973’s “Savage,” which the director famously did not jive with at all, but circumstances compelled him to get involved anyway.
That said, not all Spielberg-helmed tele-movies were made with such languid disinterest. His second made-for-television movie, “Something Evil,” is a horror story that genuinely appealed to him due to its suffocating, ominous overtones. It was a non-contractual production, making it a rare foray into something Spielberg wanted to stab at. We get to see some interesting directorial qualities here, including the tendency to let palpable tension speak for itself, along with impressive camerawork that underlines the evil lurking in the corners of the haunted house. It is, however, extremely flawed, carrying all the markers of a television movie that was made between several odd jobs at Universal (which Spielberg was juggling all at once). If you squint hard, you’ll find some thematic seeds that bloom beautifully down the line in Tobe Hooper’s “Poltergeist,” which is based on a story written by Spielberg himself.
Now, it is no surprise that “Something Evil” doesn’t hold a candle to Spielberg’s astounding body of work (or even his feature debut, which is more representative of his artistic strengths than this 1972 horror). Is this Spielberg’s worst film? It is hard to say, as “1941” exists (alternatively, it can also be interpreted as a madcap masterpiece!), along with “The BFG,” which feels uncharacteristically contrived and wooden for a Spielbergian children’s fantasy. But we were to ask the good folks at Letterboxd, “Something Evil” is the director’s lowest-rated feature on the website, sporting a measly 2.5 out of 5 despite some positive reviews.