a massive attack — this one by an infected horde, to be fair — on the settlement of Jackson paired alongside the brutal and very personal murder of Joel Miller (Pedro Pascal) at the hands of Abby (Kaitlyn Dever), showing us the ways violence manifests in every part of this world. Then, in season 2’s fourth episode, “Day One,” Joel’s surrogate daughter Ellie (Bella Ramsey) and her best friend Dina (Isabela Merced) travel from Wyoming to Seattle to find Abby, resulting in another huge action set-piece that brings all of these things together, somehow.
Advertisement
Here’s how it all goes down. As they try to track down the Washington Liberation Front, or WLF, Ellie and Dina discover bodies of WLF soldiers, or “Wolves,” strung up by Seraphites, a religious cult that stands in opposition to the military group. Before long, they’re surrounded by WLF soldiers who end up summoning a whole lot of infected beings, with Dina and Ellie barely escaping through Seattle’s subway system. As Merced explained in an interview with Variety, filming this entire sequence was, to put it lightly, intense.
“It was massive,” Merced replied, responding to a question from Kate Aurthur about filming the subway scenes. “Oh my God. And it was definitely really challenging. I think we spent a week in there, I don’t even know. It felt like a blur. And whenever we could, we would just try to escape outside and get some sun. It was really, really dark.”
Advertisement
Filming the entire subway sequence was extremely gross, according to Isabela Merced
Liane Hentscher/HBO
Now that we know that Isabela Merced and Bella Ramsey were stuck on this subway set for a significant amount of time, we can talk about Merced’s next revelation, which is that the set decoration was a little too real for her taste. “And I just remember fun facts about that, I guess, would be that [set decoration] is supposed to have some sort of soil and dirt as cooperated, but a lot of times they use the fertilizer, which has manure in it,” Merced continued before presenting the literal opposite of a fun fact. “But they didn’t have enough time to prepare, I guess, so they brought in the manure and it hadn’t had time to air out. So the majority of that experience, it smelled like sh*t. It was really disgusting. Also, Dina’s doing a lot of cardio, Ellie’s doing a lot of cardio running around. There are tons of infected, and it was actually just a crazy experience. So much happening.”
Advertisement
Not only that, but Merced (a veteran of a particularly gruesome sequence in “Alien: Romulus”) also found the scene with the WLF bodies difficult to shoot — due to the in-universe fact that Seraphites are really violent with their victims. “That was actually fake bodies, but they looked really realistic and they were hung up on that wall,” Merced told Kate Aurthur. “And it was absolutely terrifying and disgusting, and it really ruined my day to be there. Uncanny valley is a term for a reason: The brain can only take so much false information that’s appears to be real. “
“Yeah, it was disturbing and yeah, the vibes were hostile for sure,” Merced continued, adding that thanks to her previous work, she was at least a little prepared. “It reminded me a lot of my experience with ‘Alien: Romulus,’ where it was just one level of fear, then the next level, and then increasingly just building that just to eventually reach the full-fledged adrenaline rush that comes with survival. I’m glad I had that experience, because it definitely trained me for this.”
Advertisement
Bella Ramsey and Isabela Merced developed a special ‘language’ to communicate while filming this massive scene
Liane Hentscher/HBO
Not only does it sound like filming the subway sequence for “Day One,” this episode of “The Last of Us,” was smelly and gross, but Isabela Merced also revealed that the subway cars that she and Bella Ramsey had to climb, scale, and traverse throughout the scene moved, making it quite difficult for her to travel throughout the scene. “Yeah, they were actually rocking,” Merced recalled. “I think they might’ve been on one of those mechanical stands, but also at the same time, they literally had the groups of people pushing on them. I could actively feel myself bouncing from one end of the car to the other, and then also having to shoot the guns in the right place — it was a really crazy sequence. It took a long time to do.”
Advertisement
Here’s something really fascinating, though: Merced said that she and Ramsey ended up creating a “secret language” on the fly to make sure that both of them were okay during this arduous shoot:
“But because of that experience, Bella and I ended up creating a secret language — that was the sequence in which we created a secret sign language to just communicate with each other about what it is that we were comfortable with or uncomfortable with when it came to what they were asking of us. And then also if we needed to pee or if we needed to …”
When Aurthur followed up and clarified that the comfort level had to do with the physical activity in the scene and whether or not the actors used stunt doubles, Merced confirmed that doubles were always at the ready but that Ramsey wanted to jump in headfirst. “They were always there, and most of the time HBO preferred that they did it,” Merced said of the show’s talented stunt performers. “But Bella is someone very excited about the action, and maybe it’s because they’re younger than me, and I’ve been doing this for so long, I’m like, “Ah, I don’t get paid to do stuff, so I’m good! There’s somebody who has that job for a reason.”
Advertisement
Still, Merced said that she knew she and Ramsey would be okay. “I didn’t really feel unsafe ever,” she concluded. “They were really on it. It’s the perks of being a part of such a big-budget production.” That’s good to know, especially since we’ll probably see more huge action set-pieces as season 2 continues.
“The Last of Us” airs new episodes on Sundays at 9 P.M. EST on Max and HBO.
a typical episode of “Lost” would spotlight one cast member while the larger plot continued to progress around them? By the time we got to the mid-2010s, that’s how most non-“Avengers” MCU movies felt.
Advertisement
The “Captain America” movies are perhaps the biggest example of this. “The First Avenger” ended with Steve Rogers (Chris Evans) waking up 70 years after World War II; a typical second movie in the series would’ve followed up on the cliffhanger, making Steve’s struggles to adapt to the modern world a major focus. But because “Captain America: The Winter Soldier” happens after “The Avengers,” Steve has already gone through that struggle in a different movie. Instead, “The Winter Soldier” finds him thriving in the 2010s and friends with Natasha Romanoff (Scarlett Johansson), and the audience is expected to know that going in.
This trend only grows more extreme with “Captain America: Civil War,” which is barely a “Captain America” movie so much as an unofficial “Avengers” story. If you’re only watching the “Captain America” movies on their own, this would hardly be a satisfying conclusion to the Steve Rogers trilogy. Things would get even more confusing if you immediately followed the film up with “Captain America: Brave New World,” which would reveal that Steve retired and gave up the Captain America mantle between movies.
Advertisement
Indeed, despite having the same superhero moniker in their titles, all four “Captain America” movies feel strangely disconnected. Not only do they heavily feature characters who were introduced outside the “Captain America” films themselves, but there are very few actors who’ve stuck around throughout the whole journey. In fact, there’s only one character who appears in all four films, and his continued presence is especially surprising, considering what happened to him all the way back in “The First Avenger.”
Bucky Barnes is the only constant throughout the Captain America movies
Marvel Studios
Characters like Peggy (Hayley Atwell) or Sharon Carter (Emily VanCamp) may come and go, but James Buchanan “Bucky” Barnes (Sebastian Shaw) is here to stay. He’s introduced in “The First Avenger” as Steve’s unflinchingly supportive best friend, both before and after Steve gets swole. And while Bucky holds his own in one of the film’s battles, he gets unlucky during an ambush and falls off a train, plunging down into the Austrian Alps.
Advertisement
This might be a controversial opinion, but I think Bucky is sort of boring in “The First Avenger.” He’s a little too wholesome to be interesting and a little too similar to Steve to feel memorable. That’s why it was a pleasant surprise in “The Winter Soldier” when Bucky returned as a brainwashed superhuman Hydra soldier. Bucky was no longer a goody two-shoes; he was a tortured anti-hero who was only saved because Steve refused to give up on him.
Bucky’s evolution throughout the MCU is slow and steady. By the time “Civil War” picks up, Bucky is still a wildcard and is now being protected almost solely by Steve, as nearly everyone else wants him dead for one sympathetic reason or another. From there, things improve for Bucky over the next few MCU films; by the time he shows up in “Brave New World,” he’s largely back to the reliable, heroic man we met in “The First Avenger.”
Advertisement
There’s an argument to be made that Bucky is the real protagonist of the “Captain America” movies. (Or, at least, he’s the main protagonist of the first three films.) Whereas Steve Rogers is already the ideal leader from start to finish, Bucky is the one constantly forced to change. He’s a man who falls into the depths of Hell and must painstakingly climb his way back out. This arc can’t happen without Steve’s involvement, but that doesn’t change how it’s still Bucky, not Steve, who is going through the more compelling, transformative journey. Bucky is the true heart and soul of the first three “Captain America” films; it makes sense that he’d be the only original character still around for the fourth.
Trekkies will be able to tell you, however, that Mulgrew was a last-minute replacement. Canadian actor Geneviève Bujold was originally cast as Captain Janeway and was considered quite a “get” at the time, as she possessed a gentle, intense theatricality that the show’s producers felt would add prestige to “Voyager.” In the end, Bujold only worked in front of the cameras for two days before quitting in a huff. Many have seen the leaked footage of Bujold online.
Advertisement
Actor Garrett Wang, who played Harry Kim on “Voyager,” remembered his experience working with Bujold during her very brief stint on the series while appearing on the “Delta Flyers” video series in 2020. Bujold, it seems, confided in Wang when it came to her reasons for departing the show. It appears she simply didn’t trust anyone involved in making “Voyager.”
Geneviève Bujold said she didn’t trust anyone involving in making Voyager
Paramount
Watching Bujold’s footage, one can see that she might not have worked out. Bujold is a classically trained actor used to working on the stage and in films, having collaborated with notable directors like Alain Resnais, Brian De Palma, and David Cronenberg. She was no stranger to mainstream blockbusters either, having also appeared in films like “Earthquake” and Disney’s “The Last Flight of Noah’s Ark.” She even had a few TV gigs in the 1960s in her native Canada, but had only done TV movies since then. “Voyager,” it seems, was a massive TV production that moved at lightning speed, and Bujold couldn’t catch up.
Advertisement
Wang recalled Bujold being antisocial on the “Voyager” set, often running out of the room in between takes and not doing much interacting with him or any of the show’s other cast members. Curious about her thoughts regarding the series, Wang said he had to intercept one of her evacuations just to ask how things were going. He recounted the following interaction:
“[S]he looks at me and, in her French-Canadian accent, she said, ‘I feel as if I cannot trust anybody.’ And I said, ‘What? You can’t trust anybody?’ ‘Yes, when I first agreed to take the role of Janeway, I tell the producers that I want to have no nonsense with my hair. I want my hair down, I don’t want it up. I don’t want a lot of makeup … I want her to be Captain first and a woman second.'”
Advertisement
It seems that Bujold had spent some time developing Janeway into a character she was comfortable playing, but that the show’s producers had kept changing her looks, altering her hair and makeup to get it “just right.” Bujold hated that so much time was being spent on her character’s appearance, feeling it was interfering with her acting.
Wang remembers Bujold complaining about Voyager’s producers
Paramount
Wang saw how upset Bujold was, and understood that she felt betrayed. He continued:
“Literally, she was very set about it. ‘This is what I will do. I have a very clear picture about [how] I will be Captain Janeway.’ And then she said the producers agreed. ‘They agreed with me, but then before we start filming, they change everything.’ So, she felt she was kind of given a certain leeway to do what she needed to do [to] prepare herself to be Captain Janeway, and then it was taken away. It was like, ‘Sorry, you can’t do all the things that we agreed to.'”
Advertisement
An article in TV Guide in 1994 also related a moment when Bujold became angry at an on-set photographer who was seemingly taking photos of her butt without asking. The photographer said he was getting images for a potential Captain Janeway action figure, but the incident made Bujold uncomfortable. She left the set after two work days, after which Mulgrew was called in to take her place. Mulgrew had a lot more TV experience and took to the fast pace right away. Given how often Janeway’s hair changed throughout “Voyager,” she was also clearly okay with whatever the hair-and-makeup department wanted.
Bujold hasn’t worked on a TV series since her involvement with “Voyager.” Her next two movies after that were 1996’s “The Adventures of Pinocchio” and the celebrated 1997 indie film “The House of Yes.” Wang, meanwhile, would later appear on the animated show “Star Trek: Lower Decks,” playing Harry Kim and dozens of his duplicates. They both seem to be doing well.
Natasha Lyonne had a long press line clamoring for her attention Thursday night at the second season premiere of Peacock’s Poker Face in Hollywood. The veteran actress, whose multi-hyphenate duties on the critically acclaimed comedy series include writing, directing, starring and executive producing, didn’t have time to stop for every outlet before she was needed on the American Legion Post 43 stage to introduce the screening alongside her partner-in-crime Rian Johnson.
So she did something rare (and appreciated among the journalists left waiting outside) by heading to the stage to deliver those comments only to return to the red carpet and give every reporter some of her undivided attention. After detailing the “magic” of the new season thanks to a killer line-up of high-profile guest stars, The Hollywood Reporter asked Lyonne about that other new project of hers on the horizon — an artificial intelligence-infused film Uncanny Valley.
News of the project broke two days before the Poker Face premiere and caused a stir. As reported by THR, Lyonne is set to make her feature directorial debut on the film from a script she wrote with Brit Marling and both are on board to star. Set in the world of immersive video games and said to blend live-action and game elements, Uncanny Valley centers on a teenage girl named Mila who becomes unmoored by a hugely popular AR video game in a parallel present. Partners on the project — designed to offer a “radical new cinematic experience,” per an Asteria representative — include technology innovator Jaron Lanier, the AI-based studio Asteria (founded by Lyonne with partner Bryn Mooser) and Moonvalley.
It was obvious that the buzz had reached Lyonne, who was quick to defend the project during her time with THR. “Of course the movie’s going to be shot like a real movie. Now I’m really threatening to just shoot it on 35 [mm] or something to prove the point because [we are using] real-life human cinematographers and production designers and all that, of course,” explained Lyonne. “I’m a Mr. Moviefone. There’s nothing I love more than movies. Cinema is my very celluloid blood that runs through these veins. I love nothing more than filmmaking, the filmmaking community, the collaboration of it, the tactile fine art of it. I love every aspect of it — it’s so incredible. I understand my own church, in a way, even when the rest of the world doesn’t make sense. In no way would I ever want to do anything other than really create some guardrails or a new language.”
The guardrails she referenced relate to how Moonvalley relies on an AI model called “Marey” that is built on data that has been copyright cleared, unlike other viral industry leaders.
“I have this new studio that I founded, Asteria, with Bryn Mooser, and we found these amazing engineers at Moonvalley, and they agreed off this idea of why is every model dirty, like Runway and OpenAI? And why are they building it off of stolen data? Why do cell phones just have stolen data? It’s a problem,” Lyonne said. “What’s so incredible about Marey is that it’s the first underlying foundational model that you build on top of that is actually on copyrighted license, and you can go in with your concept artist and your storyboard artist and start building out a world.”
Lyonne then praised her collaborators like Marling and Lanier, the latter of whom she called “a pretty heavy hitter in this space” and a “philosophical, ethical guy.” She added: “We’re getting to really find these sort of rules of play and start to understand that there might be a way to actually have some artist protection and carve out within all this that keeps us doing the thing that we love.”
Speaking of that affection, Lyonne then recalled how close she was with the iconic filmmaker Nora Ephron. “She was a real mentor of mine — I played a lot of poker — and she would say, ‘Whatever you do, don’t be a female filmmaker. You’re only allowed one mistake and they never let you work again.’ Of course she made so many hits that wasn’t exactly true, but it was an interesting lesson about the opportunities that are given or not. I really see this as a way to get a chance to make those sort of Avengers-style sequences or something that are essentially green screen and CGI. That’s mostly what [AI] is going to be used for, and that’s what the word ‘hybrid’ means here.”
Asteria, an artist-led generative AI film and animation studio, and Moonvalley, an imagination research company, launched the first clean AI video model, which was celebrated at a L.A. party in April hosted by Asteria’s co-founders Bryn Mooser and Natasha Lyonne.
Thunderbolts* co-writer Eric Pearson has been one of Marvel Studios’ most reliable collaborators the last 15 years.
In 2010, the New York City native enrolled in Marvel Studios’ Writers Program, before cutting his teeth on the majority of the Marvel One-Shots series, including Agent Carter (2013), which served as the catalyst for the 2015-16 ABC television series that housed three Pearson-penned episodes. He then performed uncredited writing on Ant-Man (2017) and Spider-Man: Homecoming (2017), paving the way for Thor: Ragnarok (2017), his first co-writing credit on an MCU feature film. He proceeded to do some more script-doctoring on Avengers: Infinity War (2018) and Avengers: Endgame (2019) until Black Widow (2021) earned him sole writing credit. In between his Marvel work, Pearson also co-wrote Godzilla vs. Kong and Transformers One.
Coming out of Black Widow, Pearson laid the groundwork for Thunderbolts*, initiating the pitch that teamed up Widow’s Yelena Belova (Florence Pugh), Alexei Shostakov/Red Guardian (David Harbour) and Antonia Dreykov/Taskmaster (Olga Kurylenko) with a few other MCU misfits against CIA Director Valentina Allegra de Fontaine (Julia Louis-Dreyfus). Eventually, he installed the multi-faceted villain of Sentry (Lewis Pullman), establishing the foundation of the now-critically acclaimed film’s much-discussed mental health allegory.
Pearson, in time, handed script responsibilities off to director Jake Schreier’s Beef collaborators, Lee Sung Jin and Joanna Calo, as he was called into co-writing duty on Matt Shakman’s The Fantastic Four: First Steps. Thus, when the dust settled, he was only caught off guard by one particular change involving Ava Starr/Ghost (Hannah John-Kamen) and her headshot execution of Taskmaster. (In Black Widow, the child version of the character narrowly survived Natasha Romanoff and Clint Barton’s attempt to assassinate her father, General Dreykov, and he subsequently turned his gravely injured daughter into a programmable killing machine until Natasha freed her eight years later.)
“When I saw the first cut, the biggest change was Taskmaster taking that shot, and I was shocked,” Pearson tells The Hollywood Reporter. “In my drafts, Antonia Dreykov/Taskmaster lived out the movie, and she had a bit of a subplot with Ava/Ghost. They’d both been raised in labs, and Ava big-sistered her into how to break free and be her own person.”
Thunderbolts*’sunlikely union of MCU loners and rejects received the titular nickname when Alexei misinterprets John Walker’s (Wyatt Russell) sarcastic reference to Yelena’s youth soccer team. However, the name wouldn’t last long. Valentina, in a final act of self-preservation, holds a surprise press conference and presents the team as the “New Avengers,” revealing that the asterisk in the title was always meant to signify a placeholder name for something bigger and better. (As originally planned, the marketing for the film has now officially rebranded itself as The New Avengers.)
“That was a Kevin [Feige] thing. I pitched that Valentina is forced to introduce the Thunderbolts [to the public], and Kevin said, ‘I think that she should call them the Avengers.’ And I was like, ‘Whoa, okay!’” Pearson recalls. “And then there were many, many discussions: ‘Capital N? Lowercase n? Are they Avengers that are new? Are they the New Avengers?’ But that was Kevin’s idea, and it’s part of some four-dimensional chess plan that I don’t totally know yet.”
At one point during development, Yelena was going to further resolve a Clint Barton-related subplot that was set up in Black Widow’s post-credit scene and carried out in the Jeremy Renner and Hailee Steinfeld-led Disney+ series, Hawkeye. In the preceding stinger, Valentina tasked Yelena with a mission to do away with Clint, citing him as “the man responsible” for Natasha’s (Scarlett Johansson) death. But Clint later set the record straight so that Yelena understood that her adoptive sister sacrificed herself for the sake of bringing half the population back from Thanos’ blip, including Yelena.
“I loved [the confrontation scene] because it emphasized Valentina’s manipulation. Yelena entered the scene on fire, furious, accusing Valentina of setting her up to take out her sister’s killer, when, in reality, he was her best friend,” Pearson shares. “Then Valentina completely flipped the script on Yelena. I believe the line was: ‘Set you up? You mean paid you to do a job that, by the way, you didn’t even do? So I heard some bad gossip, pardon me for trying to motivate you. But this is your job, and asking questions isn’t a part of it.’”
Pearson is also revealing that, prior to Sentry’s involvement, John Walker was once the centerpiece of Valentina’s nefarious scheme.
“There were a lot of versions where Valentina had planted this kind of timebomb inside John Walker, and the goal was to make him the most unlikeable person on the team,” Pearson says. “He then becomes the monster, and [the Thunderbolts] have to talk him down. It didn’t ever totally work.”
Below, during a recent spoiler conversation with THR, Pearson also discusses the absence of Rachel Weisz’s Melina, as well as his ominous one-word tease of The Fantastic Four: First Steps.
***
Thunderbolts* is your eight or ninth official Marvel credit. Do you currently have a deal with Disney or Marvel? Or do they have you on speed dial?
I’m more on speed dial right now. I’m supposed to go in and talk to them. It’s not about anything specific, but I think they’re doing the early furniture arranging of what’s next after Avengers: Doomsday and Avengers: Secret Wars. So I’m supposed to have a meeting to window-shop, I suppose, or to see if anything fits or is exciting. But I’m floating around on my own right now.
Yelena Belova (Florence Pugh) in Marvel Studios’ Thunderbolts*
Courtesy of Marvel Studios
Assuming that Thunderbolts* was always a Yelena-centered ensemble, you’re obviously the natural choice to kick-start it since you wrote Black Widow. Was that Marvel’s thinking as well?
That was actually my thinking. Marvel didn’t really have a plan for a Thunderbolts movie. I brought it to them, but I was thinking that, having had the pleasure to meet Florence on Black Widow and write the first Yelena Belova stuff and work with her to build that character, with her doing quite a bit of heavy lifting there. She’s incredible, and I knew that she was someone who could carry a movie like this. I didn’t want to go in saying, “Let’s hide a Yelena movie in a team-up movie.” I wanted it to be a team.
The Avengers had the centerpiece of Tony Stark and Captain America, and the duality of those guys at the lead. For the Thunderbolts and the way that I wanted to view these team members and the themes of the movie, it felt like Yelena was a natural leader. I’m not sure if this comparison is fully baked, but the idea is that she’s Michael Corleone and Bucky is Tom Hagen. That’s the way that I see it.
Was this storyalways meant to smuggle the “New Avengers” into the mix?
That was a Kevin [Feige] thing. I told him I wanted to do a Thunderbolts movie and the way in was going to be through Yelena bringing them together against Valentina. I tried one pitch that didn’t work, and the second pitch was very, very close to the movie that we have now. I ended the pitch with Yelena whispering in Valentina’s ear, “You work for us now,” essentially. So I pitched that Valentina is forced to introduce the Thunderbolts [to the public], and Kevin said, “I think that she should call them the Avengers.” And I was like, “Whoa, okay!”
That was his one big note from the pitch, and when you get one note from a Marvel pitch, you get out of there. So I was like, “Okay, cool. I don’t know what your plan is for the New Avengers.” And then there were many, many discussions: “Capital N? Lowercase n? Are they Avengers that are new? Are they the New Avengers?” But that was Kevin’s idea, and it’s part of some four-dimensional chess plan that I don’t totally know yet.
David Harbour’s Red Guardian, Hannah John-Kamen’s Ghost, Sebastian Stan’s Bucky, Florence Pugh’s. Yelena and Wyatt Russell’s Walker in Thunderbolts*.
Courtesy of Marvel Studios
When the Thunderbolts are trapped in Oxe’s vault, they put their heads together to find a way out, and the solution was to put their butts together in order to climb up the silo. And the shape of their bodies is actually an asterisk. Did you notice that?
(Laughs.) As soon as you said “the shape of their bodies,” I was like, “Oh my God, it’s an asterisk!” I had not thought about that before, but it’s brilliant. The asterisk came later as well. In my drafts of the script, there was always the peewee Thunderbolts [soccer] team; that was where the name came from. We were obviously not doing Thunderbolt Ross [as inspiration from the Thunderbolts Red run]. But the asterisk was a thing that I saw later when they were in production, and I was just like, “That’s really cheeky, and I like it.”
Was there a soccer team photo in Black Widow’s photo album or the Ohio house where Yelena and Natasha grew up with Alexei and Melina?
I would love to go back and see, but I don’t think so. [Writer’s Note: After my own review, there was no soccer team photo in Black Widow.] It was probably two drafts into [Thunderbolts*] when we got the idea of Alexei calling out Yelena’s youth soccer league and having it be this great moment of both pride, connection and embarrassment for her.
Despite the deleted kiss at the end of BlackWidow, there’s still an implication that Alexei (David Harbour) and Melina (Rachel Weisz) have rekindled their romance that began as an arranged marriage for their undercover operation in Ohio. However, she’s absent in Thunderbolts*, and David Harbour indicated to me that he’s been making the case for more of her/Rachel behind the scenes. Was she excluded because a happy Alexei-Melina would undercut the film’s selling point involving a band of loners and rejects?
It was kind of what you’re saying. Alexei is in a similar emotional crater as Yelena. He just masks it much better with a lot more facade and bravado. Happiness was the enemy of the beginning of this movie. You didn’t want these characters to feel like they had anywhere to go that was emotionally stable or safe or supportive. You wanted all of them right there at the edge of the void. Also, I felt like the connection was so strong between Alexei and Yelena [in Black Widow], and I always found that the [other] hard love connection was Melina and Natasha. There’s that inspiring moment of Melina just being impressed by Natasha. So Alexei and Yelena were the peanut butter and chocolate for me; they just go so well together.
Taskmaster (Olga Kurylenko) in Marvel Studios’ Thunderbolts*
Chuck Zlotnick/MARVEL
Taskmaster’s already tragic life ended in quite a startling way. I can’t think of too many characters in the MCU, if any, who were executed like that via headshot.
That is the one biggest change. I didn’t get to go to set and finish out this one. I was actually back in Burbank working on FantasticFour at that point. When I saw the first cut, the biggest change was Taskmaster taking that shot, and I was shocked. In my drafts, Antonia Dreykov/Taskmaster lived out the movie, and she had a bit of a subplot with Ava/Ghost. They’d both been raised in labs, and Ava big-sistered her into how to break free and be her own person.
But I understand why they did it. It was probably just because of my audience reaction of being genuinely surprised. But everything else was exactly where I expected it to be, and Jake said, “We wanted to surprise the audience and raise the stakes and say, ‘Yeah, there’s danger here. No one’s safe.’ There’s a lot of saying that they’re bad people and seeing that they’re good people, so let’s make sure that we know that they’ve done bad things and have been living their lives doing harsh heartless things.”
Who knows how intentional it was, but there’s a cool moment where a window curtain strangles Bob (Lewis Pullman) and Yelena à la Natasha and Yelena’s fight in Black Widow.
Again, I wasn’t on set, but it seems so specific that I can’t imagine it not being [intentional]. If it’s not, it’s a hell of a coincidence. That was one of the most fun fights to think of [for Black Widow], and while I can’t say I designed it, I threw ideas into it. We didn’t want to end it in a draw, as in they decide they’re both the best. But whoever passes out first is going to be the first one to die, so let’s have them call a truce. So finding that moment in the fight was so great, and I hope that [the Thunderbolts* moment] was a cool little homage.
Were there any other Black Widow ties that didn’t ultimately make the final film?
No, not that I can think of. As much as we love that and where they came from, we didn’t want there to be too much looking in the past. We had to address the forever loss of Natasha and that effect on Yelena and Alexei. But we really wanted to push forward because Yelena is taking a big leadership role moving forward with this, and it’s a big journey for her. She is naturally anti-establishment, and if you look too much into the past, she couldn’t move that far forward.
Now that Robert Downey Jr. and Chris Evans have come back in unique capacities, do you think it’s only a matter of time before Scarlett Johansson is making her signature pose in the MCU again?
I will preface by saying that I have no idea, but I don’t think so. I feel like her end in Endgame and then her epilogue with our BlackWidow prequel were so lovely. So I would be surprised, but I know nothing about that. I have very little knowledge of what’s going on with Doomsday right now.
Did you ever have a draft of Thunderbolts* in which Yelena does Natasha’s pose again?
Maybe very early on. I don’t think I would’ve done it to have just done the same joke again …
Without calling attention to it was what I had in mind.
Yeah, I can’t remember the different angle I would’ve had on it. But there’s some drafts from a while ago because we were stalled by the strike. There’s a lot of early drafts that dealt with the fact that Valentina had sent Yelena to go after Hawkeye, but as more time passed, I didn’t know if that was the right touchstone to call on people to remember when it happened four years ago [in Black Widow and Hawkeye]. So things shift all the time, but I can’t remember a specific poser joke. [Writer’s Note: After anothing viewing, Alexei launches Yelena à la Steve Rogers and Natasha in The Avengers. Yelena also does a pose en route to hugging Bob that is somewhat reminiscent of Natasha.]
Was Yelena going to confront Val about what Clint Barton/Hawkeye (Jeremy Renner) confirmed to be faulty intel in Hawkeye? Do you think Val purposefully misled Yelena?
Early drafts began with Yelena confronting Valentina about ordering the Clint Barton hit, which was one of my favorite scenes that eventually became not entirely relevant to the Thunderbolts* story. I loved it because it emphasized Valentina’s manipulation. Yelena entered the scene on fire, furious, accusing Valentina of setting her up to take out her sister’s killer, when, in reality, he was her best friend. Then Valentina completely flipped the script on Yelena. I believe the line was: “Set you up? You mean paid you to do a job that, by the way, you didn’t even do? So I heard some bad gossip, pardon me for trying to motivate you. But this is your job, and asking questions isn’t a part of it.” And then that led into the conversation about how Yelena is unhappy with her job/life and wants to make a change towards something more constructive.
Hannah John-Kamen (Ghost), Lewis Pullman (Bob), Wyatt Russell (John Walker), Red Guardian (David Harbour), Florence Pugh (Yelena), Sebastian Stan (Bucky) in Thunderbolts*
Chuck Zlotnick/MARVEL
Jake Schreier told me that Sentry wasn’t in your draft that he read before he committed, but that he was added to the very next one. Was the depression theme born out of Sentry? Or did you have some of those seeds planted already?
I think he might be wrong on that by one draft, but I’d have to check the timeline. I really, really wanted to end the third act with a hug, with an emotional moment, as opposed to a beating into submission. So there were a lot of versions where Valentina had planted this kind of timebomb inside John Walker, and the goal was to make him the most unlikeable person on the team. He then becomes the monster, and they have to talk him down. It didn’t ever totally work.
But thank God for my time in the Marvel Writers Program. I read the Sentry run back then, and in thinking about another villain that they can’t beat in a punching fight, I was like, “Wasn’t there a Superman who also had a dark side to him?” So I went back and read some of it, and it was very much like, “Yeah, The Sentry is the golden God of pure goodness, and the Void is pure evil. That can just as easily work for heroic ambition and self-esteem versus depression and self-loathing and loneliness and isolation.” So, yeah, it always was [planted]. Once we saw that and realized that all the character arcs were embodied in one person who could be the physical antagonist, that’s when the movie really locked together.
But I’m surprised. I thought that there was a draft with the Sentry before Jake came on. I remember him really locking into the Void Space. My idea of the Void Space was a lot more ethereal and dreamy. But his was more Being John Malkovich room mazes of very real, grounded stuff. So that helped incredibly in visualizing it and making it feel more unsettling.
I had someone call me earlier to say that her husband saw Thunderbolts* last night with his friends, and that they had a great time before speaking about mental health. The ultimate goal is for the audience to have a great time, and if there’s this added benefit of having meaningful conversations, how great is that?
You were all there at roughly the same time, but did you know Jake, Jon Watts or Chris Ford at NYU?
No, I met Jon Watts during the Spider-Man: Homecoming reshoots, and we ran down the list of teachers and all that. So we were right next to each other, and we probably rode in the same elevators a bunch of times or passed each other on the streets. But I didn’t know any of them until we got out here, and they’re a cool crew of people. When Jake came on, he showed me a bunch of the weird videos they’d shot in Brooklyn when they got out of college, and it seemed so fun. I didn’t have the same kind of creative ambition amongst my friend group. I guess we did do some videos, but theirs were just way better. (Laughs.)
Thunderbolts* ends with a Fantastic Four-branded ship headed straight for Earth-616 from their parallel Earth. I assumed this would be answered in The Fantastic Four: FirstSteps like the handoff of Fury’s pager from Avengers: Infinity War’s post-credit scene to Captain Marvel’s mid-credit scene. But it was shot by the Russos on the Avengers: Doomsday set, potentially as part of Doomsday.
I can’t speak to that part.
In any event, what do you make of this bridge between Thunderbolts* and The Fantastic Four: First Steps?
I don’t think I can say anything, honestly. I can’t take credit for that tag scene either. I believe [co-writer] Joanna Calo wrote that, and I’m very jealous of it. It’s so funny and good. One of my favorite parts of the whole movie is John Walker saying, “I don’t know what any of these buttons do, nobody labeled them.” (Laughs.) That, for me, is one of the funniest things.
Have you seen The Fantastic Four: First Steps at this point?
I have seen one cut of Fantastic Four, but it was before additional photography.
Can you share an adjective or two?
I will share a proper noun: Galactus. That’s all I’m going to say.
Ryan Coogler’s 1932-set vampire movie Sinners has become a cultural phenomenon, and I’m sure that everybody at Marvel is elated for him. That said, has it made the Blade situation slightly more frustrating since there’s clearly an appetite for vampiric mayhem? (Costume designer Ruth E. Carter recently confirmed that, prior to Coogler hiring her for Sinners, she’d been prepping a now-defunct 1920s-set Blade. Pearson was a co-writer on the overall project.)
I cannot talk about The Blade situation. I’m so sorry. I wish I could, but I can’t. Sinners, though, that movie rules.
What else is on the horizon for you?
I’ve been working on this movie Fast and Loose for Netflix. It’s an action movie with a fun premise. [Writer’s Note: Will Smith and Michael Bay are attached.] I wanted this [other] deal to close so I could tell you guys, but there’s a franchise at a different studio that I’m hoping to reboot soon. They just couldn’t get the numbers straight, so I can’t say it. But hopefully we can talk about it during Fantastic Four.
*** Thunderbolts* is now playing in movie theaters nationwide.
Mandy Moore, best known to screen audiences as one of the stars of NBC’s This Is Us, has joined comedian Nate Bargatze in The Breadwinner, a comedy feature that Eric Appel is directing for TriStar Pictures.
Additionally, up and comers Stella Grace Fitzgerald (Rebel Moon), Birdie Borria (The Fabelmans) and Charlotte Ann Tucker (Thunderbolts*) have joined the cast to play the onscreen couple’s daughters in the film.
Bargatze, one of the world’s top touring comedians, co-wrote the script and is producing the film with Dan Lagna. Former Marvel Studios exec Jeremy Latcham is also produce for Wonder Project.
The story sees the life of Bargatze’s character turned upside down when his supermom wife, played by Moore, lands a deal on Shark Tank. The lifelong breadwinner of the family becomes a stay-at-home dad, and quickly realizes he’s in way over his head.
Moore starred for six seasons as Rebecca Pearson in NBC’s award-winning drama This Is Us, earning multiple Emmy, Golden Globe and Critics Choice nominations. She recently portrayed investigative journalist Benita Alexander in Peacock’s Dr. Death alongside Édgar Ramírez.
She is also known for voicing Rapunzel in Disney’s Tangled movie, as well as the character’s many iterations across TV and video games. More recently, Moore lent her voice to Hulu’s top animated series Happy Family USA, created by Ramy Youssef and Pam Brady. She repped by Gersh, Untitled Entertainment and Johnson Shapiro.
Fitzgerald is repped by Gersh and Luber Roklin Entertainment. Borria is repped by DDO Artists Agency and Brave Artists, and Tucker is repped by The Osbrink Agency and New Beginnings Entertainment.