by admin | Jul 18, 2025 | TV & Beyond Articles
released a video from his show on Instagram bearing the following message:
“I want to let you know something that I found out just last night. Next year will be our last season. The network will be ending ‘The Late Show’ in May. It’s not just the end of our show, but it’s the end of ‘The Late Show’ on CBS. I’m not being replaced. This is all just going away.”
After Colbert broke the news, CBS executives released their own statement praising Colbert as “irreplaceable” and lamenting the sad state of the modern TV landscape. “This is purely a financial decision against a challenging backdrop in late night,” the statement read. “It is not related in any way to the show’s performance, content, or other matters happening at Paramount.”
That last sentence is notable because, given a recent monologue from Colbert, not everyone finds it believable. CBS is owned by Paramount, and on Monday, Colbert harshly criticized Paramount for agreeing to a $16 million settlement with President Donald Trump. The settlement was the result of a transparently flimsy lawsuit from Trump alleging that “60 Minutes” had deceptively edited its interview with then-presidential nominee Kamala Harris in 2024, a claim that largely fell apart when CBS released all the footage to the public.
[embedded content]
“I believe this kind of complicated financial settlement with a sitting government official has a technical name in legal circles: It’s Big Fat Bribe,” Colbert stated. “This all comes as Paramount’s owners are trying to get the Trump administration to approve the sale of our network to a new owner, Skydance.”
Quoting from a media journalist’s report on the merger, Colbert added, “Once Skydance gets CBS, the new owner’s desire to please Trump could ‘put pressure on late night host and frequent Trump critic Stephen Colbert.'” Jokingly stroking his new mustache, Colbert added, “Okay, but how are they going to put pressure on Stephen Colbert if they can’t find him?” In light of recent events, the joke’s a little less funny now.
Why Colbert’s cancellation spells bad news for The Daily Show

Comedy Central
Colbert isn’t the only late night host to criticize Paramount for its $16 million so-called settlement. Jon Stewart at “The Daily Show” has repeatedly ripped into the company for the decision, even bringing in former “60 Minutes” correspondent Steve Kroft to help explain to the audience how galling the settlement was. “It was a shakedown, that’s what I’d call it,” Kroft told Stewart. “I mean, some people call it extortion.” Stewart ridiculed Paramount for the decision constantly prior to that interview and has only continued to do so since then. It’s concerning, though, because the show’s home channel, Comedy Central, is also owned by Paramount and, as such, its life is similarly in the hands of Paramount executives.
[embedded content]
For signs of hope, fans of “The Daily Show” have pointed to the series’ promising ratings: It recently hit a 10-year high in viewership. What’s more impressive: Mondays, the one day a week Stewart hosts, are consistently the highest-rated day of the week. Not only is “The Daily Show” proving its worth ratings-wise, but the correspondent who’s insulted Paramount the most is also the least replaceable of the group.
The problem is that viewers can’t actually trust that these decisions are being made purely based on the numbers. According to the recent Nielsen ratings, “The Late Show with Stephen Colbert” still regularly tops its time slot and has gained viewers in this last quarter. If Colbert staving off viewership decline couldn’t save him, can we trust that it’ll save Stewart?
When Stewart himself was asked if he’s worried about a potential cancellation of “The Daily Show” on his podcast, his answer seemed confident: “Let me tell you something,” he replied, “I’ve been kicked out of s***tier establishments than that. We’ll land on our feet.” His reasoning was that corporations are motivated by profit at the end of the day, and he thinks the Emmy-winning “The Daily Show” is still valuable enough to have a future at Comedy Central:
“If they’re looking at it as purely a real estate transaction, I think we bring a lot of value. That may not be their consideration. They may sell the whole f***ing place for parts. And we’ll deal with it when we do. But I’m so happy and proud of everybody that works over there. [Paramount/Skydance] want to do that? Knock themselves out.”
Why The Daily Show deserves to continue

Comedy Central
Even ignoring its improving ratings and its cultural relevance (only “South Park” rivals “The Daily Show” in terms of how much media buzz it rakes in), “The Daily Show” shouldn’t be canceled because it’s simply very good right now. After an awkward few years after Trevor Noah’s departure in 2022, in February 2024, the show struck gold with its new format: Jon Stewart would host on Mondays and one of the other correspondents would host the next three days of the week.
The result is that Stewart has gotten to enjoy the lack of burnout that comes from a full-time hosting gig, and every Monday still feels like a special event. What’s been even more fun is getting to better know the other rotating hosts: Jordan Klepper, Desi Lydic, Ronny Chieng, and Michael Kosta all bring something different to the table. (Although Desi Lydic’s the best of them, let’s get that straight.) They all seem to be on their A-game because they’re competing to get that eventual full-time host slot, but many fans hope the show never settles on a full-time host since the weekly variety has kept the whole thing fresh. (Fresher even compared to certain stretches of Stewart’s original run.)
But the best thing about “The Daily Show” is that it’s arguably the only weekday late-night show with some actual bite to it. Jimmy Kimmel’s Trump-trashing feels too middle school-coded to move the needle, while Seth Meyers has been pretty open about how he doesn’t expect his show to change any minds. But when Jon Stewart gets serious in his Monday night monologue, it still feels important. Not only is “The Daily Show” a beloved institution with decades of history behind it, but it’s still a well-loved, hard-hitting TV show today. If Paramount (or its upcoming owners Skydance) decided to cancel it, it would be a travesty.
by admin | Jul 18, 2025 | TV & Beyond Articles
Nicholas Hoult is the most accurate Lex Luthor in a movie to date, and Rachel Brosnahan is a snappy, hard-nosed, and kick-butt Lois Lane.
When all three of these actors spoke to Total Film recently, bouncing ideas around for the sequel, Brosnahan dropped one item on her wish list: Wonder Woman. “There’s some storied history between Lois and Wonder Woman,” she noted.
Well, good news! (Maybe?) Recent reporting by Variety says that Warner Bros. is fast-tracking the new Wonder Woman movie, though a “Superman” sequel hasn’t been locked-in just yet. If there is one though, it’ll almost assuredly be out by the time audiences have already met their new Wonder Woman (whoever winds up playing her).
Gunn, who’s also the co-head of DC Studios, wasn’t shy about putting other DC heroes next to the Man of Steel in the DC Universe’s first movie; “Superman” also features the “Justice Gang,” which is composed of Guy Gardner’s Green Lantern (Nathan Fillion), Mister Terrific (Edi Gathegi), Hawkgirl (Isabela Merced), and, by the end of the film, Metamorpho (Anthony Carrigan). But whereas the DC Extended Universe’s follow-up to its own Superman solo vehicle, “Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice,” tried to assemble all of DC’s icons at once (including Wonder Woman, as played by Gal Gadot), Gunn knows to keep Superman as a lead and the second stringers as just that.
About Diana and Lois’ “storied history,” though. There is one path you can take with that history that the DCU should stay far away from…
DC Comics
DC Studios, don’t do the Superman/Wonder Woman romance in the DCU

DC Comics
Superman and Wonder Woman have a history as a superhero power couple. Mark Waid and Alex Ross’ 1996 comic “Kingdom Come” shows a dark future where Lois is murdered by the Joker, but Superman finds love again with Diana. Later, DC Comics’ 2011 reboot, the New 52, served to make the characters younger. Ergo, Clark Kent and Lois were no longer married, and Superman was hooking up with Wonder Woman instead. The duo even starred together in a co-billed comic series titled “Superman/Wonder Woman,” which ran from 2013 to 2016. But soon enough, things went back to how they should be.
Superman/Wonder Woman has always been a hackneyed pairing to me — one that’s not only inspired solely by the characters’ surface similarities but also does a disservice to Diana’s character. She’s the strongest woman in the world, but even she falls over herself for the world’s strongest man.
Meanwhile, Corenswet and Brosnahan have great chemistry as Clark and Lois. One of the best scenes in “Superman” features Lois interviewing Clark in-character as Superman. She holds his feet to the fire, showing she won’t let even her super-strong boyfriend get in the way of good journalism. But as “Superman” is spread thin, Clark and Lois spend a lot of their screen time apart. In the second act, Clark is locked up in Lex’s pocket dimension prison while Lois is seeking a way to get him out. Then, during the third act, Superman is saving Metropolis while Lois leads the Daily Planet staff in publishing an exposé of Luthor’s crimes. The two come together at the end for a big kiss, granted, but a sequel needs to have Clark and Lois together more, not less. Splitting them up would be even worse.
In Phil Jimenez and Joe Kelly’s “Wonder Woman” #170, Lois interviews Diana. Lois is a bit jealous, egged on by media speculation that Superman and Wonder Woman are an item, but Diana uses her lasso of truth to show there’s nothing between her and Clark. Nor should there be in the DCU.
“Superman” is playing in theaters. The release date for the DCU’s upcoming “Wonder Woman” movie has not been confirmed at this time.
by admin | Jul 18, 2025 | TV & Beyond Articles
an IMAX 70mm screening, providing the enormous image and sound that is impossible to get at home, as well as the fluid, tangible look of celluloid. Thanks to the recent success of films like “Sinners” and “Oppenheimer,” with those movies’ respective filmmakers hyping up the versatility and specialness of the formats, the general public are becoming hip to the charms of premium viewing options.
All of this has led to what will undoubtedly be seen as a watershed moment in movie theatergoing. This week, Universal Pictures made the unprecedented move to sell tickets to a film which hasn’t even finished shooting yet: Christopher Nolan’s “The Odyssey,” due for release on July 17th, 2026. The film’s first teaser trailer has been playing in theaters since the release of “Jurassic World Rebirth,” and the hype for a movie a year away is nothing new. Not only was this practice of teasers released way in advance common during the pre-internet days, but it’s been the standard for Nolan’s films ever since “Inception.” Yet the sale of tickets for a movie that’s not even done yet is very new, and its rabid reception — with every IMAX 70mm showing entirely sold out for the first four showtimes in all major cities — sets what could be a horrific precedent for moviegoing in the years to come.
Turning movies into concerts cheapens the experience and makes it uncomfortably elitist

AMC Theaters Distribution
Here’s the biggest issue with the precedent the “Odyssey” presale sets: It continues this slow, disturbing transformation of movies into what has become of concerts and Broadway theatre, something that will irrevocably change the entire experience of the medium. This transformation can already be seen in the decline in audience etiquette, something which the theater chains and studios have begun either tacitly accepting or, in the latter case, actively encouraging, as filmmakers and official accounts eagerly repost people’s pictures and videos of a movie playing in a theater that they took with their smartphones. As many have pointed out, this practice has incredibly little to do with celebrating the art on screen; in our clout-based society, the art is nowhere near as important as the Event, and everything becomes secondary to proving that you were present at the Event. That’s something which in and of itself is elitist, and the snapping up of rare tickets for a hotly anticipated movie is part of that practice. Posting on social media that you got your tickets for “The Odyssey” a year out isn’t about actually going and seeing the film; it’s about letting everyone know that you’re one of the lucky few to have the ability to go see it in the format it was made to be seen.
In conjunction with this concert-going behavior comes one of the banes of modern existence: online ticketing. To be fair, no company or business has managed to find a way to equitably and reliably offer online ticketing when demand is very high, no matter how much they try. Even those of us who do all we can to prep, like myself, can easily be left in the cold. I logged onto AMC Theaters’ website and the app simultaneously just as the “Odyssey” tickets began to drop, and I could easily get into the theater’s seat map. However, each seat I chose was somehow already purchased by the time I was trying to check out, forcing me to start all over again and play the world’s worst game of Minesweeper in trying to determine which seat I selected I could actually purchase. And this was just one seat for myself — imagine trying to buy one for a friend or significant other. Within just a few minutes, it was all over: All the seats at my preferred theater were gone, and I was out of luck. If the deluge of friends and colleagues’ social media posts crowing about their own victories didn’t sting enough, the sight of several scalpers selling tickets (marked way up in price, of course) for that location on eBay sure did. Add to this the growing popularity of popcorn buckets and other attendant (and pricey!) souvenir merch, and the fact that, so far, the only perk one gets with their “Odyssey” presale purchase is a commemorative ticket, and it seems like movie theaters have all but completed their transformation into concert venues.
Hollywood needs to put its money behind building more IMAX theaters, not hypebeast and aura gimmicks

Saban Films
Of course, all is not literally lost for me, as more showtimes for the film will be added — the big reason why the presale was only one showtime per day is because, again, the movie is still shooting, and the theaters literally can’t know what other showtimes to book when there is no final runtime yet. Yet all may be lost for the possibility to casually plan on seeing a major new film in its best format on opening weekend, as this presale proves beyond a doubt that people will happily book themselves a year in advance for the next hot ticket. If you’re a well-to-do single person with a flexible schedule, this practice becoming normalized may not mean much to you. However, if you’ve got a rigid work schedule, a family to support, a partner to consider, or even just a rocky financial situation, prepare to have a headache around what used to be a leisure activity.
The takeaway that Hollywood should be getting from the response to the “Odyssey” presale is that there’s a massive demand for premium formats, and that more theaters than just 30 (in the whole world!) should be able to show movies shot specifically for the IMAX 70mm format. There does seem to be a bit of movement in that area, fortunately — there are two new screens being specifically constructed (or revamped) to handle IMAX 70mm in Los Angeles, for instance. Yet the big cities shouldn’t be the only places where these films can be seen properly, as it only contributes to the scarcity which puts too much focus on the event and not the art itself. People follow trends, after all, and while it’s great to see excitement, demand, and popularity for cool stuff, it can often lead to the art being replaced by the aesthetic. The Criterion Closet should be revered for the culture which the videos are seeking to elucidate, and not simply for the cultural clout it carries.
It’s probably unlikely that many other films will be treated in exactly the same way as “The Odyssey,” both for the logistical reasons mentioned earlier as well as varying levels of hype. Yet while this won’t become the norm for every movie made from now on, it could very well be the reality for most major appointment viewing releases. It may not be as extreme as tickets dropping a year out, but the window for purchase may creep up earlier and earlier. Theater subscription services like AMC A-List, which normally allow a ticket to be booked for an IMAX screening as cheaply as a regular ticket, may consider not just a first screening but all opening weekend screenings an “event” and exclude them from their service, charging full price a la the “Odyssey” presale. Maybe the hotly anticipated “Dune 3” and “Avengers: Doomsday” will begin selling their seats for next year, too, and maybe buying a ticket for a movie may become more like buying season tickets for an opera — remember how theater chains wanted to instill dynamic pricing over the last decade? Whatever ends up happening, there’s no denying that this new, strange odyssey of moviegoing has begun, whether we like it or not.
by admin | Jul 18, 2025 | Articles, Hollywood Reporter Articles
The Venice Film Festival on Friday unveiled this year’s competition jury, the group of film professionals that will pick this year’s Golden Lion for best film at the 82nd Venice Film Festival. Brazilian actress Fernanda Torres, Iranian auteur Mohammad Rasoulof, French director and screenwriter Stéphane Brizé (At War). Italian director and screenwriter Maura Delpero (Vermiglio), Palme d’Or winning Romanian director Cristian Mungiu (4 Months, 3 Weeks and 2 Days) and Chinese actress Zhao Tao (Ash is the Purest White) will all sit on the main jury.
As previously announced, Two-time Oscar-winning director Alexander Payne (The Holdovers, Sideways, Nebraska) will head up the jury as president. Payne has only once screened a film in the Venice competition, with Downsizing debuting on the Lido in 2017.
In addition to the best film Golden Lion, the competition jury selects the Silver Lion Grand Jury prize, Silve Lions for best director, the Coppa Volpi for best actor and best actress, as well as the festival’s best screenplay award, a special jury prize and the Marcello Mastroianni Award, named after the late Italian film icon, for best young actor or actress.
Venice on Friday also unveiled that the Horizons, or Orrizonti, jury will be chaired by French director and screenwriter Julia Ducournau. She will be joined by Italian director and video artist Yuri Ancarani, Argentine film critic Fernando Enrique Juan Lima, Australian director Shannon Murphy, and U.S. artist and filmmaker RaMell Ross.
Finally, chaired by Scottish filmmaker Charlotte Wells, the jury of the “Luigi De Laurentiis” Venice Award for a Debut Film will also include French-Tunisian director and producer Erige Sehiri and Italian director and screenwriter Silvio Soldini.
The 82nd Venice festival runs Aug. 27-Sept. 6.
by admin | Jul 18, 2025 | TV & Beyond Articles
“Superman” makes the radical choice of being an unapologetically silly, earnest, and sincere movie about a genuinely good guy who respects all life, values truth and justice, and is just out here trying to save people as he fights for a better tomorrow.
Though the film is firmly Golden Age in how political Superman is, it’s also very much a love letter to DC’s Silver Age comics in terms of its tone and outlandish concepts. This is, after all, a movie where a kaiju attacks Metropolis, keyboard-typing monkeys post rage-bait online, silly heroes fly around left and right, and nobody bats an eye at any of it. Even Lex Luthor’s (Nicholas Hoult) big real estate scheme is pretty elaborate, even by his standards.
The gamble works in no small part because Gunn creates a world that feels lived-in, allowing “Superman” to kickstart a cinematic universe that can support all sorts of stories and tones. Unlike the DC Extended Universe, this new DC Universe already feels like a connected, comic book-based setting where characters like Swamp Thing and Booster Gold could conceivably co-exist without asking too much of audiences.
Arguably, however, the most Silver Age thing in “Superman” is also the character that makes the movie shine the brightest: Krypto the super-dog.
The Dog of Tomorrow steals the show in Superman

Warner Bros. Pictures
It would’ve been easy for Gunn to portray Krypto as the perfect dog, much like the traditional white labrador from DC’s comics and cartoons who’s depicted as being noble, strong, and worthy of being called the “Superdog.” Instead, the DCU’s Krypto is an adorable ball of pure chaos. Indeed, he’s a horribly misbehaved super-pup who steals every scene he’s in. The very first scene in “Superman” also makes it clear Krypto is going to be important to the story, as he literally saves the Man of Steel after his first major defeat leaves him doing the Yamcha death pose.
We really should have seen this coming, given how good Gunn is at writing lovable, heart-stealing animals that end up becoming hugely important to his movies. He not only got the world to fall in love with a talking tree and a raccoon, but he even found a way to turn a major Marvel movie into a stealth “We3” adaptation with “Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3.” Now, with “Superman,” Gunn has once again given us an adorable animal companion who’s easy to love and can pull at the heartstrings. It’s no coincidence that Superman (David Corenswet) is at his angriest and most emotionally vulnerable when confronting Lex about his stolen super-pup.
And yet, just like this “Superman” subverts the history of Krypton (turning Superman into Goku in the process), it also drastically changes how people view Krypto. To be sure, this version of Krypto is far from obedient or well-behaved. Rather, he’s a demon spawn who has more in common with the Green Lantern Guy Gardner (Nathan Fillion) than Clark Kent. Whether he’s inadvertently beating up Superman with his super-strength by jumping all over him, destroying Mister Terrific’s (Edi Gathegi) assorted gadgets, or looking adorable playing with the cows at the Kent family’s farm (at least until Superman clarifies he had to stop Krypto from accidentally killing the cows in the process), he’s absolutely delightful and weird.
Krypto is essential to the story of Superman

Warner Bros. Pictures
Far from a glorified mascot who’s there to sell toys, Krypto is thematically relevant to both “Superman” and the fabric of the greater DCU. Regarding this last part, we get hints throughout the movie that people are surprised by the existence of this alien dog, with both Lex and even Lois Lane (Rachel Brosnahan) not knowing the Man of Steel had a dog. Hence, when we reach the end of the film and discover Superman is merely dog-sitting for his cousin Kara Zor-El, aka Supergirl (Milly Alcock), it makes for a great way of teeing up the latter and her upcoming solo movie. It’s also why Supergirl’s appearance is arguably the best cameo in the film, as she pays off one of the movie’s running gags.
Then there’s Krypto’s larger importance to the story in “Superman.” In a way, the super-pup is kind of like humanity for Superman: He’s chaotic, volatile, and prone to violence, but also cute and in need of guidance. It’s a testament to Superman’s goodness that he keeps trying to help Krypto. That the Man of Steel goes to great lengths to rescue a dog that’s not even his, and not even a respectful one, speaks volumes to his character. As the hero notes at one point in the movie, “He’s out there alone … and probably scared.”
Sure, Krypto is not entirely defenseless, given he can fly and has super-strength. Still, the way Gunn uses Superman’s relationship with his dog to showcase the character’s kindness is a brilliant move.
“Superman” is now playing in theaters.
by admin | Jul 18, 2025 | Articles, Hollywood Reporter Articles
Ukrainian director Sergei Loznitsa (Two Prosecutors) will serve as the jury president for the 31st edition of the Sarajevo Film Festival next month.
The other members of the jury of the competition program – feature film are Serbian actor Dragan Mićanović, Romanian director, writer and actor Emanuel Pârvu, Bosnian-Dutch director and writer Ena Sendijarević, and Berlin International Film Festival director Tricia Tuttle, who previously ran the BFI London Film Festival.
“Loznitsa joins a rich constellation of film auteurs who have previously presided over the Sarajevo Film Festival jury in past editions,” organizers said on Friday. They inclyde Mike Leigh (2004), Jasmila Žbanić (2006), Jeremy Irons (2007), Nuri Bilge Ceylan (2008), Ari Folman (2011), Danis Tanović (2013), Béla Tarr (2014), Michel Franco (2017), Asghar Farhadi (2018), Ruben Östlund (2019), Michel Hazanavicius (2020), Mia Wasikowska (2023), and Paul Schrader (2024).
The Sarajevo fest winners will be unveiled during the awards ceremony on Friday, Aug. 22.
Italian auteur Paolo Sorrentino is this year’s recipient of the Honorary Heart of Sarajevo award. The 31st Sarajevo Film Festival takes place Aug. 15-22.
The world premiere of Dino Mustafić’s Bosnian dark comedy The Pavilion, set in a retirement home, will open the fest. The screenplay was written by Viktor Ivančić, with Emir Imamović Pirke as co-writer.
Mićanović (Coriolanus, Rocknrolla) is known for his work in film, theater, and TV. Pârvu has acted in films, collaborating with key Romanian New Wave directors. His movie Three Kilometers to the End of the World premiered at Cannes 2024 in competition, received the Queer Palm, and became Romania’s international feature Oscar entry. The film also won the Heart of Sarajevo Award for best feature film at last year’s Sarajevo Film Festival.
Sendijarević’s debut feature Take Me Somewhere Nice (2019) won Sarajevo’s Heart of Sarajevo Award for best feature film. Her second feature, Sweet Dreams, was the Dutch submission for the 2024 international feature Oscar race.