Charlize Theron as Andy in The Old Guard 2.
Eli Joshua Ade/Netflix
Tobey Maguire, Andrew Garfield and Tom Holland aren’t the only ones with Spidey senses.
Spider-Man: No Way Home director Jon Watts recalled a time when fans were speculating that the two Spider-Man stars were set to appear in the third Holland-led film ahead of its late 2021 release. During a conversation with Collider at the Mediterrane Film Festival, the filmmaker revealed he had to shift how Maguire and Garfield entered the story because a fan on Reddit predicted his original idea.
“There had been rumors that Tobey and Andrew were going to be in the movie, and this is while we’re shooting,” he recalled. “We were writing the script, and we were working on where we wanted to reveal the guys, and it always seemed like Peter’s going to be sad because Aunt May has just died, and that the portals are going to open, and the two Spider-Men are going to step out.”
Watts said after sleuthing on the discussion platform, he noticed a fan-made piece of art identical to the then-planned scene in No Way Home that would reveal Maguire and Garfield.
“Then I was on Reddit, and I was looking at people who had already made fan art of, ‘This is probably what it’s going to be like when the two Spider-Men get revealed.’ It was on a rooftop. It was sad, two Doctor Strange portals were open and two Spider-Men are stepping out,” he explained. “I was like, ‘Well, we can’t do that. If that’s exactly what everyone thinks we’re going to do, we absolutely can’t do that.’”
After that, they opted to have Maguire and Garfield’s Spider-Men appear in Ned’s (played by Jacob Batalon) grandmother’s home. Watts explained that they specifically wanted the two former Spider-Man actors to appear in such way to add an element of surprise for fans.
“So, after I saw all this fan art, and I’ve decided, ‘We absolutely can’t do just exactly what everyone thinks we’re going to do,’ I was like, ‘What does no one expect that we’re going to do? What’s something that no one’s going to see coming?’” he recalled. “I was like, ‘Probably having the two Spider-Men appear at Ned’s Filipino grandma’s house in Queens. I don’t think anyone was doing fan art of that on Reddit.’ It made perfect sense in the story because it’s kind of the first time we leave Peter’s narrative.”
Holland’s Peter Parker instead crossed paths with Maguire and Garfield’s Spider-Men on a roof while he’s mourning the death of Aunt May. Screenwriters Chris McKenna and Erik Sommers told The Hollywood Reporter both of the former franchise leads “had great ideas that really elevated everything” in terms of their evolving individual Spider-Man characters.
“They had thoughts, and it was really interesting and helpful to see their thoughts,” Sommers said, while McKenna added, “There’s a crucial, moral moment that they help [Holland’s Peter Parker] get through in the climax of the movie. So much of that was brought by Tobey and Andrew’s ideas and shaping of what they thought their characters could bring to this story.”
Holland’s fourth Spider-Man film, deemed Spider-Man: Brand New Day, will be directed by Destin Daniel Cretton (Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings). While details of the project have been strictly kept under wraps, McKenna and Sommers did return to write the screenplay.
Spider-Man: Brand New Day will hit theaters next summer on July 31, 2026.
Charlize Theron never planned to make a sequel to 2020’s The Old Guard, but when it became one of Netflix’s most viewed films of all time, the pieces already happened to be in place.
The coda at the end of Gina Prince-Bythewood’s soulful action drama teased that Quỳnh (Veronica Ngô), the long lost immortal lover of Theron’s Andromache (Andy) of Scythia, had finally been freed from her underwater tomb where she drowned and re-drowned millions upon millions of times. That extra piece of story wasn’t necessarily intended to be sequel bait; it just made sense to illustrate that the story is never over for a group of immortal warriors.
With director Victoria Mahoney now at the helm, The Old Guard 2 chronicles Andy and the Old Guard’s renewed purpose to do good in the world, all while Andy further adjusts to being a mere mortal per the last movie’s story point. But Quỳnh’s unexpected return to civilization and the simultaneous emergence of Uma Thurman’s mysterious figure known as Discord test Andy and her team in unprecedented ways. And similar to the original film, the second chapter also ends on another tantalizing cliffhanger.
When asked if she’s confident about the likelihood of a third Old Guard film, Theron refuses to get ahead of herself, something she’s wised up to over the years.
“Never confident, no. One thing I’ve learned in this business is that there are no guarantees, and it’s really gracious of [Netflix] to not have pushed us into another direction,” Theron tells The Hollywood Reporter in support of The Old Guard 2’s July 2 release. “This was always where we wanted to land the film, and it’s also very reminiscent of the first one. So we treated this one exactly the same, but I’m being completely honest when I say that we have absolutely no idea what that [third film] would even look like.”
Later this month, Theron will join the set of Christopher Nolan’s The Odyssey. She’s portraying the mighty sorceress, Circe, at a point when Nolan and co. have already been filming for five months.
“I feel like I’m going to be the new kid on the block. I know it’s epic from reading the script, but for myself, I’m only there for two weeks, I think,” Theron shares.
During an interview with this THR writer in 2020, Theron candidly expressed how “heartbreaking” it was to be recast ahead of George Miller’s Mad Max: Fury Road prequel, Furiosa. It’s rare for an actor and a character to catch lightning in a bottle like Theron and her vengeful mechanic did, and so one would think that today’s technology — or simple suspension of disbelief à la Spike Lee’s flashback narrative in Da 5 Bloods — would be pursued to keep that iconic pairing together. However, Anya Taylor-Joy instead took over the 20-something version of the character.
Theron has deep admiration for Taylor-Joy and Miller’s 2024 film, but she reiterates that the recasting is still a point of contention given how long she lived in Furiosa’s shoes and the hardships she endured along the way.
“There’s nothing around [the recasting] that, to me, felt malicious. It was something that just dragged out for too long, and I totally understand it. It still doesn’t make it feel any better,” Theron says. “I probably lived in [Furiosa’s] body the longest out of any of my characters, and it was challenging. It was really challenging. But I think [Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga] is absolutely beautiful.”
Fury Road’s chaotic production has been well documented at this point, but in an age where behind-the-scenes stories are being turned into narrative features or series more and more frequently, it seems inevitable that Fury Road will eventually get the same treatment that David Fincher applied to Citizen Kane through Mank. (Other recent making-of narratives include The Disaster Artist, The Offer and Peter Farrelly’s upcoming movie about Rocky.)
Theron has never contemplated the possibility of a Fury Road making-of movie, but she does agree with the suggestion that a former co-star of hers would be an excellent choice to play her. “Yeah, [Mackenzie Davis] is incredible. She’s got the arms,” Theron says.
Below, during a recent conversation with THR, Theron also discusses her friendship with Keanu Reeves and their ongoing attempts to reunite on screen. Then she previews her next Netflix actioner, Apex.
***
On behalf of everyone, we love when you make action movies, but you always seem to pay a physical toll for our entertainment. Did that trend continue on this one?
I got a black eye on this one, but I didn’t break anything, so it’s getting better.
Compared to your past movies, I’m glad to hear that.
It’s mostly bruising. It’s a kind of bruising that is hard to describe. When you do these fight sequences where you don’t want to cut every two seconds, there’s no way around it. So to play things continuously, your body takes a bit of a bruising, and there’s only so many pads that you can put underneath your costume.
Charlize Theron as Andy in The Old Guard 2.
Eli Joshua Ade/Netflix
Are you glad that the stunt community that helps create Andy, Lorraine (Atomic Blonde) and Furiosa can finally receive Oscar recognition?
Over the moon. It’s such a joyous moment, but it’s also frustrating that it took this long. They are incredible performers, and without those performances, we couldn’t do what we need to do.
Andy is still mortal like she was at the end of the first Old Guard, and there are times where she has to use KiKi Layne’s character, Nile, as a shield. But overall, does she still fight as if she’s immortal? Or has she had to change her fighting style?
Yeah, I don’t think she’s reckless. She’s eager, but she’s not reckless. She really values working as a team and she really values her team. She also finds something in Nile that makes her want to be close to her, even though she’s being a shield for her. She knows that she’s going to be okay, but she wants to keep her close to her. So I don’t think she’s got a death wish. That’s not the Andy that we meet. We meet an Andy who is at peace with her reality and her circumstance, but she’s also excited to want to continue.
Having Uma Thurman square off against you is inspired casting. Had the two of you crossed paths over the years?
No, we kind of knew each other from afar, but I’ve always been a massive fan. I can’t tell you how many times we’ve developed something and I would throw her name out there. I’ve constantly tried to pull something together with us, and I’ve also had so many people around me whose opinions I really value, say, “You guys have to make a movie. People will absolutely love to see the two of you do action.” Her action is so strong, and she’s really raised the bar. So I felt like I had to really bring it. She was going to bring it, so I had to bring it.
I’ve been laughing to myself over what you said to her during your Hot Ones Versus episode: “Just eat a fucking wing, bitch!”
(Laughs.) That’s amazing. I can’t even remember saying that because I was in such panic. So thanks for reminding me. I’ll make a mental note of that.
Have you spent much time on helicopters? I suppose what I’m really asking is why you’d put yourself through the harrowing stunt of hanging off one.
No, I haven’t spent a lot of time on helicopters; I’m not crazy about them either. It just came out of the creative process and wanting to make that third-act set piece be as big as we all wanted it to be. Given that Uma was in it, we wanted it to really feel like an incredible set piece. So when we started adding these helicopters, we then had to figure out how they fit into the action.
Fred North, who’s a legend in the business and does all the helicopter action work in every movie, then came on board. And I asked him: “How can we enhance this story without it feeling like action for the sake of action? How can we do it in a way that feels practical and not on stage with a blue screen or a green screen? How can we do it practically and safely so that it feels like you haven’t seen this before in a movie?” And he said to us, “I don’t know why, but I’ve never done this with an actor. [Hanging an actor off the side of a helicopter] is actually incredibly safe if we do it the right way. It will look great, and you can do it all practically with a real helicopter.” So he was really the one that threw this idea at us, and that’s where it originated.
Charlize Theron as Andy and Uma Thurman as Discord in The Old Guard 2.
Eli Joshua Ade/Netflix
It’s so easy to be impressed by what you pull off on screen, but you often talk about how unimpressed your kids are. Have they given you your props yet?
They’re kids. They’re doing exactly what they’re supposed to do. I don’t think anybody’s kids really feel that way about their parents, no matter what they do. And they’re teenagers now. So, even if they were [impressed], they would never show it. But I want to believe that we’ll actually sit down one day when they’re old enough to have a glass of wine, and they’ll say, “You know what, Mom? It was pretty badass when you were 50 and you were hanging off that helicopter. We never gave you your props.”
You wrapped principal photography on The Old Guard 2 a few years ago, but post-production lasted much longer than anyone expected. Did any silver linings emerge from the extra time?
Yeah, you just try to utilize the time. It wasn’t necessarily [extra] time that we wanted. It was unfortunate, and it was just what was going on in the world. COVID was still really taking a toll on our business, and we had to shut down a couple of times. But you take advantage of that, and the creativity never stops. Even when you cut the camera, you’re still thinking about it that night, and it’s the same in the editorial process. So I never looked at that time as wasted. There’s nothing you can do about it, you can’t control it, but we utilized it to our best. We threw a lot of spaghetti against the wall, so we really, really know that this is the best movie being put forward.
The film ends on a brutal cliffhanger, and I desperately want to believe that Netflix wouldn’t let you do that unless they already expressed interest in a third film. How confident are you at this moment in time?
Oh, never confident, no. One thing I’ve learned in this business is that there are no guarantees, and it’s really gracious of [Netflix] to not have pushed us into another direction. This was always where we wanted to land the film, and it’s also very reminiscent of the first one. We never ended the first one thinking we were going to do a second, but that was just how it happened to be. So we treated this one exactly the same, but I’m being completely honest when I say that we have absolutely no idea what that [third film] would even look like.
What else are you proud of on a producorial level?
First and foremost, nobody got hurt. That’s the thing that you’re always challenged by and worried about, especially when big set pieces come up. It’s making sure that nothing falls through the cracks. We did that big end [helicopter] set piece towards the end of the shoot, and it was already a long shoot. Everybody was really tired, and that’s when you really have to have an extra cup of coffee because that’s usually when mistakes happen. So I’m just really happy that nobody got hurt.
Secondly, I’m really proud of the film that we’re putting out. It hasn’t necessarily been an easy nut to crack. It’s a big world with giant mythology, and the characters play a central part in telling the story of the Old Guard. So it makes the writing and the development really challenging because you want everybody to be able to have time. This is why television is so great. How do you do that in two hours and really give everybody the moment that they need in a story? It’s really complicated without making it convoluted.
So I look at the movie now after many years of it being in post, and I’m very, very proud of the film that we’re putting forward. We really did what we initially set out to accomplish, and we never backed off that. No matter how hard it got, we stayed on that same road.
(L-R) Henry Golding as Tuah, Luca Marinelli as Nicky, Marwan Kenzari as Joe, Charlize Theron as Andy and KiKi Layne as Nile in The Old Guard 2.
Eli Joshua Ade/Netflix
During summer 2020 press for the first Old Guard, I remember you getting a lot of headlines for saying that you’d never had a meeting with Marvel to that point. Did those headlines actually wake them up? The timing between your quote and Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness’ photography was close enough that it gave off that impression.
Oh, I have no idea. I spent one day with them on that set. I spent most of that time really trying to wrap my head around what they wanted to do and where this was going. This is their process. It works for them. I was happy to come on board because it felt like there was a lot of room to explore, but I don’t know if that’s what it was. I should have asked them.
In other news, congratulations on being employed by Christopher Nolan.
Thanks!
You’ve been on plenty of huge movies, but does this one take the cake?
Well, I haven’t been there yet. Like you guys, I’m just hearing and seeing everything from afar. I’m leaving in three weeks or something like that, and I feel like I’m going to be the new kid on the block. I know it’s epic from reading the script, but for myself, I’m only there for two weeks, I think. Chris is the kind of filmmaker who knows exactly what’s in his head, and he knows the movie that he’s making, so I am going to go with that. But doing Fury Road and shooting it for a hundred days, that was as epic as I’ve ever gone. [Note: Theron has since confirmed that she’s playing the sorceress Circe.]
There’s a somewhat recent trend of movies or shows about the making of famous movies. David Fincher made Mank about the writing of Citizen Kane. The Disaster Artist chronicled The Room’s origin. The Offer explored the behind-the-scenes of The Godfather, and there’s a movie being made soon about Rocky’s production. Do you think it’s only a matter of time before somebody makes a narrative feature about the making of Mad Max: Fury Road?
I can honestly tell you I’ve never thought about that. I do not know what the realities are or how plausible [that would be]. I can’t even think about it that way. The great thing is people can be so creative and actually pull something great out of that, but it’s just not something that I’ve ever spent any time thinking about.
I already know who should play you in the behind-the-scenes movie, and it’s obvious to anyone who’s seen a 2018 gem called Tully.
(Laughs.) Yeah, [Mackenzie Davis] is incredible. She’s got the arms.
When I spoke to you five years ago, you were incredibly candid about Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga and how “heartbreaking” that recasting decision was. Did you let yourself watch it?
I watched it, and I think it’s a beautiful film. I am a massive fan of Anya [Taylor-Joy]. She’s an incredible actor. There’s nothing around [the recasting] that, to me, felt malicious. It was something that just dragged out for too long, and I totally understand it. It still doesn’t make it feel any better. I probably lived in [Furiosa’s] body the longest out of any of my characters, and it was challenging. It was really challenging. But I am so supportive of what ended up happening, and I think the movie is absolutely beautiful.
You were bowled over when I previously mentioned this to you, but I spoke to John Wick directors, Chad Stahelski and Dave Leitch, for their film’s tenth anniversary last year. And I informed them both that your terminally ill Sweet November character mailed a dog to Keanu 13 years before John Wick’s terminally ill wife mailed him a dog. Apparently, Chad learned about it shortly after the first movie came out, but Dave didn’t know.
(Laughs.) You are obviously a lover of film because not a lot of people would know that.
More importantly, it’s been too long since you and Keanu have worked together. Who can I blame for this drought?
Honestly, there’s no one to blame. We are really trying, and we have been for all these years. Obviously, we are both very busy, but we have been in development on a couple of things. We’re both very similar in the sense that we love each other. We’re family, and we want to find the thing that is really worthy of the two of us being in it. In many ways, it’s like doing a sequel to [The Old Guard]. We don’t want to just do it for the sake of doing so, but we think about it a lot.
You mentioned during your Hot Ones episode that Keanu is most likely to not show up for a dinner party of yours. Is that a thing with him?
Oh my gosh, did I? I can’t remember why I said that. He definitely goes by his own clock, but not in a disrespectful way. He always shows up. He’s professional. He’s a great friend. He’s one of the most loyal friends I’ve ever had. He’s also great in the sense that you can pick up with him exactly where you left off, and I don’t need to talk to him every single day. But he is a bit of an enigma, and I wouldn’t be surprised if he didn’t show up.
The first time you worked together was on The Devil’s Advocate (1997). Was the darkness of that story a lot to put yourself through so early in your career?
Now, when I think back, I’m like, “Yeah.” Maybe it’s just me, but when you’re that age, you’re just so naive, almost. You’re so eager that you almost don’t have time to think about the fact that this could really fall on its face. You’re working with brilliant actors, one who was legendary at that time. You have never done anything to stand on, and you’re all of a sudden doing a scene opposite Al Pacino at 3:00 AM. It could all go so wrong, but when you’re that age and you’re that eager, I was just completely optimistic. It doesn’t mean that you don’t feel like you’re going to fail, but you’re more like, “I’m going to get it right. Give me one more shot. I’m going to get this right.” So, in retrospect, there’s this wonderful fearlessness that we have when we’re young. It’s called stupidity. (Laughs.) We lose a little bit of that as we get older, but that fearlessness is what I think got me to where I am, hopefully.
You were an EP on Mindhunter, and there was recent talk that it might be revived in the form of three feature films. Should we temper our expectations at this current juncture?
I think you know just as well as I do that it’s really in the world of David. It’s up to him, and if he wraps his head around it, then it will happen. I know that he loves this world just as much as I do, but he only does things when he really feels like there’s potential in it. He’s a realist, and if he wants to do it, he’ll do it.
Lastly, you just produced and starred in another Netflix actioner called Apex?
Yeah, we just wrapped Apex. It was really a challenge, and it was a different challenge. When I read the script, I was like, “Oh, this could be really refreshing. There’s no fight scenes, so I won’t have to learn a style of fighting. It’s really just action, like climbing a mountain and running.” And boy was I wrong. I messed with the Gods. It was very practical, very real, and I truly did things on this movie that I never ever thought I would do. So it’s been good. I keep pushing myself.
***
The Old Guard 2 premieres July 2 on Netflix.
Whether it’s Tom Cruise playing a cocky Navy pilot, Will Smith taking on aliens or Jessica Chastain helping bring down Osama bin Laden, Hollywood has plenty of films to satisfy one’s Fourth of July cravings.
Published on July 1, 2025
click here for some of America’s most patriotic (and un-patriotic) musical offerings.
Subscribe
Sign Up
After leaving the cast of “Sons of Anarchy,” Sheridan turned to writing and churned out an absolute banger in the form of “Sicario,” a script that was then brought to life by director Denis Villeneuve, catapulting both of their careers into the stratosphere. A couple of years after that, Sheridan made the jump to helming one of his own scripts when he oversaw the Jeremy Renner and Elizabeth Olsen-led thriller, “Wind River.”
The film stars Olsen as Jane Banner, an FBI agent who heads to the Wind River Indian Reservation to solve the case of the murder of one of its locals. Lending a helping hand and his tracking skills is Jeremy Renner as Cory Lambert, who discovers the frozen body of the victim and gets invested in helping bring the killers to justice. As it stands, “Wind River” is still one of Sheridan’s best movies, proving he could direct a film just as well as he could write one. However, Sheridan had some strict stipulations that needed to be satisfied before he officially boarded the project. These requests weren’t merely for his own benefit either. Rather, he knew the real-life Native American community was counting on him to be respectful when it came to his portrayal of them.
Speaking to Interview Magazine about the film in 2017, Sheridan recalled that he always had his eye on “Wind River” being his true feature debut as a director (even though he’d called the shots on a horror movie years earlier), if only because he wanted to ensure the film’s sensitive subject matter was addressed in an appropriate way. “I always knew that this one I would direct. I would rather it not get made than be made with another director,” he explained.
The message that resonates throughout the film is just how much Native American women are overlooked when it comes to missing person cases. As the film rightfully states in its final moments, “While missing person statistics are compiled for every other demographic, none exist for Native American women.” It was this detail, along with the modern Native American reservation culture as a whole, that Sheridan was determined to highlight. As he noted:
“There are countless directors better than me — this is the first time I’ve done this at this scale — but I knew that if I did it, it would be done exactly the way I promised friends of mine on the res it would be done and that the vision wouldn’t be diluted and the message wouldn’t change. That was more important to me.”
That dedication shines through in a film that earned critical acclaim and enough at the box office to even warrant a sequel. It’s also that level of authenticity that has continued into the “Yellowstone” saga, a world of Sheridan’s own making where he’s rightly permitted to call the shots himself.
In a career spanning 37 years and over 50 features, there have been few instances when Aamir Khan has been outshined in a film. His acting prowess, enduring stardom and usually impeccable creative instincts have held him in good stead. But in Sitaare Zameen Par (Stars on Earth), the actor-producer becomes a second lead to a group of spunky, neurodivergent, mostly debutant actors who steal every scene they are in.
Casting directors Tess Joseph and Anmol Ahuja have done a superb job, and Ashish Pendse as Sunil, Aroush Datta as Satbir, Aayush Bhansali as Lotus, Rishi Shahani as Sharma Ji, Gopi Krishnan K Verma as Guddu, Rishabh Jain as Raju, Vedant Sharma as Bantu, Samvit Desai as Kareem, Naman Misra as Hargovind and Simran Mangeshkar as Golu — a player whose preferred strategy in competitive situations is kicking her opponent between the legs — are all pitch perfect, yet individually distinctive. This is a group of smart, resilient and cheerfully irreverent people who definitely don’t want your pity. One of my favorite moments in the film is an exchange between two of them about a girlfriend who happens to be a sex worker. As the film’s tagline says, “Sabka apna apna normal hai” (“everyone has their own normal”).
Sitaare Zameen Par
The Bottom Line
Heavy-handed but winsome.
Release date: Friday, June 20
Cast: Aamir Khan, Genelia Deshmukh, Ashish Pendse, Aroush Datta, Aayush Bhansali, Rishi Shahani, Gopi Krishnan K Verma, Rishabh Jain, Vedant Sharma, Simran Mangeshkar, Samvit Desai, Naman Misra, Dolly Ahluwalia Tewari, Gurpal Singh, Bijendra Kala
Director: R.S. Prasanna
Screenwriter: Divy Nidhi Sharma
2 hours 35 minutes
Remaking the 2018 Spanish movie Champions, director R. S. Prasanna and writer Divy Nidhi Sharma replay the beats and lines almost exactly. But there is a new scene in the second half in which Gulshan (Khan) tries to process a situation with his mother, Preeto (Dolly Ahluwalia Tewari), and what Prasanna and Divy Nidhi Sharma have added is so sparkling that I wish they had recreated the earlier movie with more abandon.
Sitaare Zameen Par tells the story of a prickly, unlikable basketball coach who after a DUI is ordered by a judge to train neurodivergent adults as community service, rather than go to jail. Gulshan’s life is already a mess. He has lost his job and separated from his wife and is living with Preeto, played by Tewari with the right touch of affection and exasperation. He’s an insensitive, rude man who in the beginning refers to his players as pagals (mad), arguing, “What is the meaning of this — that you can’t call mad people mad?”
Gulshan is the exact opposite of Ram Shankar Nikumbh, the compassionate, caring teacher that Khan played in 2007’s Taare Zameen Par in 2007; if Gulshan and Nimbukh met, they would barely be able to make conversation. But slowly, Gulshan changes — as one of the players says, “We are coaching him.” By the end of the film, he comes to understand that he was never the teacher, and that the people he had considered inferior were in fact always ahead of him. Like Rocky Randhawa in Rocky aur Rani Kii Prem Kahaani (Rocky and Rani’s Love Story), Gulshan comes to understand that the things we learned in childhood or imbibed from our environment aren’t necessarily right.
Prasanna, whose last film, Shubh Mangal Saavdhan (Let the Marriage Be Fruitful), was about erectile dysfunction, has a talent for adding lightness and wit to complicated situations. There is an inherent generosity in his worldview, which is inclusive and positive and humane. Soaked in sweetness and life lessons, Sitaare Zameen Par is insistent on making us into better people by asking us to reconsider our definitions of normality and success. Winning in life, it reminds us, is about so much more than a competition.
But the moral high ground can get exhausting. One character, played by Kartar Paaji, has a role that is mostly explaining, expounding and underlining the central message. Ram Sampath’s background score does even more of this emphasizing. It’s almost as if Prasanna didn’t trust that we would get the messaging, so he keeps hammering it in again and again for over two and a half hours.
Keeping with that tonality, Khan pitches his performances a few notches higher than his counterpart Javier Gutiérrez’s in the Spanish original. Though his arched eyebrows, perpetual frown and exasperated hand gestures are a little more obvious, he makes it work. Genelia Deshmukh’s Sunita, Gulshan’s wife, isn’t well fleshed out, but she gets one scene in which she shines. And Shankar Ehsaan Loy’s effervescent title track adds buoyancy to the narrative.
Be warned that Sitaare Zameen Par isn’t a patch on Taare Zameen Par. That film shattered your soul with finesse and delicacy and then, magically, enabled you to heal again. This one, though a spiritual sequel, doesn’t possess the same artistry; it’s too on-the-nose and front-loaded with sentimentality. But it will put a smile on your face — and perhaps even nudge you to suspend judgment the next time you encounter someone who doesn’t fit your definition of normal.
“Elio” is a flop, which sucks because the movie is actually rather fun. It’s got great alien designs, an entertaining story, and a Carl Sagan quote designed that will make you quite emotional about the possibilities and power of science while also just reminding you of one of the most fascinating minds to walk this planet in the last century.
Sure, it’s easy (and not unfair) to blame the marketing for the failure of “Elio” at the box office, combined with the competition from other, higher-profile films. Still, that doesn’t change the fact that this simply wasn’t Pixar’s best. What’s more, reports have surface that the movie suffered heavily behind-the-scenes, undergoing creative changes that resulted in a vastly different film hitting theaters than the one imagined by the project’s creator and original director.
An article by The Hollywood Reporter highlights the series of changes made to the film and its story, ranging from the erasure of its queer elements to the movie’s Latino representation being all but removed. This is also what led to voice actor America Ferrera and director Adrian Molina leaving the project, and reading the report, it’s hard not to be furious at how Pixar ruined what could have been a very special film (by turning it into one that’s just fine) because it was afraid of how the public would respond … yet no one bothered to see the movie anyway.
According to the report, Elio (Yonas Kibreab) was initially queer-coded and meant to reflect the fact that Molina is an openly gay filmmaker himself. Though sources say Molina didn’t envision the movie as a coming out story due to Elio being only 11 years old, there were nevertheless moments that quite clearly hinted at the character’s sexuality.
For instance, the report mentions a sequence shown to Pixar employees two years ago in which Elio “collected trash on the beach and turned it into homemade apparel that included a pink tank top,” as well as a scene that reveals Elio’s bedroom is adorned with pictures “suggesting a male crush.” As one former Pixar artist told THR, “It was pretty clear through the production of the first version of the film that [studio leaders] were constantly sanding down these moments in the film that alluded to Elio’s sexuality of being queer.”
Unfortunately, growing feedback from Pixar leadership led to Elio becoming more typically masculine instead, with the report citing an early test screening in which viewers indicated they liked the film but didn’t feel a strong desire to see it in a theater. This isn’t an issue specific to any one movie, either; rather, it’s a larger issue that Disney helped create (with Disney CEO Bob Iger having admitted that sending select Pixar movies straight to streaming was a terrible idea). Soon after the test screening, along with a separate screening for Pixar leadership, Molina exited the project, and the movie was reworked under its new co-directors Madeline Sharafian and Domee Shi.
“I was deeply saddened and aggrieved by the changes that were made,” former Pixar assistant editor Sarah Ligatich, who is a part of the company’s internal LGBTQ group PixPRIDE, told THR. “The exodus of talent after that cut was really indicative of how unhappy a lot of people were that they had changed and destroyed this beautiful work.”
In addition to the queer erasure, there is something else missing from the final film — Elio Solís’s Latino identity. Given Molina’s background and the voice cast of “Elio,” one would naturally expect the film’s main characters being Latino would play a crucial role in the story. Instead, that’s not at all the case with the movie, which feels like a hugely missed opportunity.
Indeed, when “Elio” was first announced back in 2022, Ferrera took the stage at Disney’s D23 fan event to describe her role as Olga, Elio’s mom. But in the final film, Zoe Saldaña plays Olga, now Elio’s aunt. According to THR, sources at Pixar say Ferrera had already recorded dialogue for her role, but she exited the film after Molina’s departure. Specifically, one former Pixar source said, “America was upset that there was no longer Latinx representation in the leadership.” Which, yes, she should be. You don’t just name your main character Elio Solís, recruit a Latino voice cast, and include a parental figure who works in the military for absolutely no reason.
These two big changes take away enough from “Elio” that the final film feels devoid of an identity. As it stands, audiences got a fun but unremarkable film, a bland Pixar summer flick that — as test screening audiences reportedly said — you don’t really need to see in a theater.
Of course, the queer erasure in “Elio” isn’t entirely new. Just last year, it came to light that Pixar’s Disney+ series “Win or Lose” scrapped a transgender storyline at the behest of studio higher-ups. If Pixar is to save face, regain the trust of audiences, and enjoy success with something other than sequels, then it needs to start letting its creatives, well, create rather than robbing their art of the very things that make it meaningful.
“Elio” is now playing in theaters.