TV & Beyond on 2025-05-05 22:20:00

TV & Beyond on 2025-05-05 22:20:00

success of “A Minecraft Movie,” Jack Black can still draw audiences in with his brand of silly big screen comedy. It may not be everybody’s cup of tea, but few actors are better than he is when playing “big kid” characters, may they be good-hearted individuals like Dewey in “School of Rock” or those with rather questionable morals and values (such as real-life fraudster Jan Lewan in “The Polka King”). You could also count Hal Larson from “Shallow Hal” in the latter category, but due to the 2001 film’s arguably problematic humor and the generally unlike behavior of Hal and his best friend Mauricio (Jason Alexander) for most of its runtime, one would be hard-pressed to find it in a list of Jack Black’s best movies. (Or a list of the best Farrelly Brothers movies, either.) As it turns out, the actor also wasn’t a big fan of the project.

Advertisement

In a 2006 interview, Black opened up about his experience working with directors Peter and Bobby Farrelly on “Shallow Hal,” and he admitted feeling excited to work with the siblings because he found their movies funny. But while he didn’t go into specifics, Black admitted he wasn’t happy with the fact that he got paid handsomely for what was ultimately an unsatisfying project. “I wasn’t proud of it, and I got paid a lot of money, so, in retrospect, it feels like a sell-out,” he explained (via ScreenGeek). 

Black wasn’t the only Shallow Hal star who disliked working on the movie

The key premise of “Shallow Hal” isn’t too complicated — while under hypnosis, the titular character pictures women to be as beautiful outside as they are inside. As such, he sees his boss’ daughter, Rosemary Shanahan (Gwyneth Paltrow), as a slim woman despite the fact that she actually weighs around 300 pounds. In order to achieve this illusion, Paltrow had to wear a fat suit for scenes where she appeared as the real Rosemary. And much like Jack Black felt negatively about “Shallow Hal” years after the fact, Paltrow would later admit that wearing the prosthetics proved to be a miserable experience. “The first day I tried the fat suit on, I was in the Tribeca Grand and I walked through the lobby,” she explained (via The Guardian). “It was so sad. It was so disturbing. No one would make eye contact with me because I was obese. I felt humiliated.”

Advertisement

While many of the fat jokes and other bits of humor in “Shallow Hal” may have aged like milk, it can also be argued that the Farrelly Brothers’ hearts were in the right place when they were making the movie — focusing solely on one’s physical attributes is indeed a shallow and immature way to go about dating. Even Black seems to have relaxed his stance on “Shallow Hal” since that time he confessed to feeling like a sell-out for appearing in it. “It was a really funny script and a funny story, but it had a lot of emotional underpinnings too,” he said in a later interview (via YouTube). “It had some cool resonance … and I think that’s why it stuck around for all those years.”

TV & Beyond on 2025-05-05 21:45:00

TV & Beyond on 2025-05-05 21:45:00

Howard threatened to quit the show after its second season. He was perturbed that the network wanted to foreground the series’ breakout character, Arthur “Fonzie” Fonzarelli (Henry Winkler), in order to reverse its sudden ratings slide (caused by going head-to-head with the immensely popular “Maude” spinoff “Good Times”). Fortunately, Winkler himself was cool to the idea of the show being retitled “Fonzie’s Happy Days,” so the change didn’t happen and Howard stuck around.

Advertisement

Nevertheless, Howard was growing more and more ambitious with each passing year. Evidently, he didn’t make his restlessness known to ABC execs, because they were caught completely off guard when he announced he was leaving the show after season 7.

NBC’s Fred Silverman swooped down and swiped Ron Howard from ABC

According to a 1980 article in the Mansfield News Journal, Howard’s departure was motivated by ABC’s refusal to let him get more involved in the show off-camera. Per Howard, he was unhappy with “ABC’s unwillingness to really let me get into the production area as deeply as I wanted to — they see me pretty much as Richie. They didn’t take me very seriously.”

Advertisement

This was a total own goal on ABC’s part. Howard had already directed one feature in 1977 (the Roger Corman-produced “Grand Theft Auto”), and was not shy about discussing his eagerness to direct again. So when former ABC executive Fred Silverman offered Howard a decent chunk of change to join him at NBC, the actor bolted “Happy Days.” It was an attractive deal for Howard, if only because Brandon Tartikoff, the president of NBC Entertainment, took him much more seriously than the folks at ABC did. “Howard does it all and does it extremely well as creator, actor, producer and director,” Tartikoff told the AP.

How did ABC feel about this? As one unnamed exec told the News Journal, “It was like those legends you hear when an eagle swoops down and snatches a baby from the cradle and flies off.” The series did a quick retool by adding Ted McGinley to the cast as Mrs. Cunningham’s nephew Roger. While McGinley’s a terrific actor (as you know if you’re watching Apple TV+’s “Shrinking”), he didn’t mesh well with Winkler, Anson Williams, and Donny Most. “Happy Days” managed to stay on the air for four more seasons after Howard left, but people mostly watched it out of habit.

Advertisement

As for Howard and NBC, he appeared in three made-for-TV movies, but, for whatever reason, he never got to direct one of them. When he satisfied the terms of his contract, he quit television and directed the R-rated comedy “Night Shift” starring Winkler and a brash, hilarious newcomer named Michael Keaton. The film was a hit, and Howard’s filmmaking career was off and soaring.

TV & Beyond on 2025-05-05 21:00:00

TV & Beyond on 2025-05-05 21:00:00

Tom Hardy-led actioner “Havoc” held strong in the top spot among the streamers’ programming in the U.S., but according to viewership aggregate site FlixPatrol, it’s since been unseated from number one by the new German thriller “Exterritorial.”

Advertisement

Written and directed by Christian Zübert, “Exterritorial” stars “Barbarians” actress Jeanne Goursaud as a mother on the hunt for her missing kid. The twist? The child apparently disappeared inside a U.S. consulate building in Germany, and Goursaud’s Sara has to bend and break more than a few rules to find him. Fortunately, Sara is an ex-Special Forces officer, so she’s equipped to fight her way through the consulate building and get to the bottom of her son’s disappearance – potentially uncovering a vast conspiracy in the process.

Exterritorial just punched its way to the most-watched spot on Netflix

While “Exterritorial” isn’t getting the best reviews (it currently holds a 5.8 rating on IMDb, and only 42% of Rotten Tomatoes viewers liked it), it does have the kind of premise that grabs hold of you if you happen to catch a teaser for it on the Netflix home page. From the Angelina Jolie-led historical film “Changeling” to Jodie Foster’s “Flightplan,” stories about moms fighting tooth and nail to recover their lost kids – often with very little help from the systems designed to help them – have long-since been a staple of the thriller genre. According to Decider’s John Serba, the movie is “a rough amalgam of political thriller ‘Rendition’ and ‘John Wick’-derivative action movies like ‘Extraction’ and ‘Atomic Blonde,'” but it mostly holds its own thanks to some punchy fight choreography.

Advertisement

“Zubert nurtures a realistic tone for a while, before inching away from the verisimilitude of a more realistic conspiracy thriller with every passing roundhouse, chokehold and armbar,” Serba writes. Based on reviews from critics and viewers alike, it seems your opinion on the film might come down to how much ridiculousness you’re willing to endure for the sake of watching a strong woman beat up a bunch of bad guys. Still, it’s always great to see a non-English language film top the streaming charts, proving (as Netflix in particular often has before) that subtitles are, as Bong Joon-Ho once said, simply the “one-inch tall barrier” standing between audiences and a whole new world of movies.

“Exterritorial” is led in the streaming viewership rankings by two other action films. In addition to “Havoc” (another unrealistic action-thriller directed by “The Raid” filmmaker Gareth Evans), “The Equalizer 2” also made the Netflix top 10 as of Monday, May 5, 2025. The Denzel Washington-led film made bank at the box office when it was initially released in 2018, but we won’t know whether or not “Havoc” and “Exterritorial” could’ve followed the same lucrative path since Netflix has a tendency to keep its movies on the small screen.

Advertisement

You can catch all three films — as well as other current chart-toppers like the “Twilight” saga and the Tina Fey-Amy Poehler comedy “Sisters” — on Netflix now.

TV & Beyond on 2025-05-05 20:45:00

TV & Beyond on 2025-05-05 20:45:00

a massive attack — this one by an infected horde, to be fair — on the settlement of Jackson paired alongside the brutal and very personal murder of Joel Miller (Pedro Pascal) at the hands of Abby (Kaitlyn Dever), showing us the ways violence manifests in every part of this world. Then, in season 2’s fourth episode, “Day One,” Joel’s surrogate daughter Ellie (Bella Ramsey) and her best friend Dina (Isabela Merced) travel from Wyoming to Seattle to find Abby, resulting in another huge action set-piece that brings all of these things together, somehow.

Advertisement

Here’s how it all goes down. As they try to track down the Washington Liberation Front, or WLF, Ellie and Dina discover bodies of WLF soldiers, or “Wolves,” strung up by Seraphites, a religious cult that stands in opposition to the military group. Before long, they’re surrounded by WLF soldiers who end up summoning a whole lot of infected beings, with Dina and Ellie barely escaping through Seattle’s subway system. As Merced explained in an interview with Variety, filming this entire sequence was, to put it lightly, intense.

“It was massive,” Merced replied, responding to a question from Kate Aurthur about filming the subway scenes. “Oh my God. And it was definitely really challenging. I think we spent a week in there, I don’t even know. It felt like a blur. And whenever we could, we would just try to escape outside and get some sun. It was really, really dark.”

Advertisement

Filming the entire subway sequence was extremely gross, according to Isabela Merced

Now that we know that Isabela Merced and Bella Ramsey were stuck on this subway set for a significant amount of time, we can talk about Merced’s next revelation, which is that the set decoration was a little too real for her taste. “And I just remember fun facts about that, I guess, would be that [set decoration] is supposed to have some sort of soil and dirt as cooperated, but a lot of times they use the fertilizer, which has manure in it,” Merced continued before presenting the literal opposite of a fun fact. “But they didn’t have enough time to prepare, I guess, so they brought in the manure and it hadn’t had time to air out. So the majority of that experience, it smelled like sh*t. It was really disgusting. Also, Dina’s doing a lot of cardio, Ellie’s doing a lot of cardio running around. There are tons of infected, and it was actually just a crazy experience. So much happening.”

Advertisement

Not only that, but Merced (a veteran of a particularly gruesome sequence in “Alien: Romulus”) also found the scene with the WLF bodies difficult to shoot — due to the in-universe fact that Seraphites are really violent with their victims. “That was actually fake bodies, but they looked really realistic and they were hung up on that wall,” Merced told Kate Aurthur. “And it was absolutely terrifying and disgusting, and it really ruined my day to be there. Uncanny valley is a term for a reason: The brain can only take so much false information that’s appears to be real. “

“Yeah, it was disturbing and yeah, the vibes were hostile for sure,” Merced continued, adding that thanks to her previous work, she was at least a little prepared. “It reminded me a lot of my experience with ‘Alien: Romulus,’ where it was just one level of fear, then the next level, and then increasingly just building that just to eventually reach the full-fledged adrenaline rush that comes with survival. I’m glad I had that experience, because it definitely trained me for this.”

Advertisement

Bella Ramsey and Isabela Merced developed a special ‘language’ to communicate while filming this massive scene

Not only does it sound like filming the subway sequence for “Day One,” this episode of “The Last of Us,” was smelly and gross, but Isabela Merced also revealed that the subway cars that she and Bella Ramsey had to climb, scale, and traverse throughout the scene moved, making it quite difficult for her to travel throughout the scene. “Yeah, they were actually rocking,” Merced recalled. “I think they might’ve been on one of those mechanical stands, but also at the same time, they literally had the groups of people pushing on them. I could actively feel myself bouncing from one end of the car to the other, and then also having to shoot the guns in the right place — it was a really crazy sequence. It took a long time to do.”

Advertisement

Here’s something really fascinating, though: Merced said that she and Ramsey ended up creating a “secret language” on the fly to make sure that both of them were okay during this arduous shoot:

“But because of that experience, Bella and I ended up creating a secret language — that was the sequence in which we created a secret sign language to just communicate with each other about what it is that we were comfortable with or uncomfortable with when it came to what they were asking of us. And then also if we needed to pee or if we needed to …”

When Aurthur followed up and clarified that the comfort level had to do with the physical activity in the scene and whether or not the actors used stunt doubles, Merced confirmed that doubles were always at the ready but that Ramsey wanted to jump in headfirst. “They were always there, and most of the time HBO preferred that they did it,” Merced said of the show’s talented stunt performers. “But Bella is someone very excited about the action, and maybe it’s because they’re younger than me, and I’ve been doing this for so long, I’m like, “Ah, I don’t get paid to do stuff, so I’m good! There’s somebody who has that job for a reason.”

Advertisement

Still, Merced said that she knew she and Ramsey would be okay. “I didn’t really feel unsafe ever,” she concluded. “They were really on it. It’s the perks of being a part of such a big-budget production.” That’s good to know, especially since we’ll probably see more huge action set-pieces as season 2 continues.

“The Last of Us” airs new episodes on Sundays at 9 P.M. EST on Max and HBO.

TV & Beyond on 2025-05-05 20:30:00

TV & Beyond on 2025-05-05 20:30:00

by | May 5, 2025 | TV & Beyond Articles

a typical episode of “Lost” would spotlight one cast member while the larger plot continued to progress around them? By the time we got to the mid-2010s, that’s how most non-“Avengers” MCU movies felt.

Advertisement

The “Captain America” movies are perhaps the biggest example of this. “The First Avenger” ended with Steve Rogers (Chris Evans) waking up 70 years after World War II; a typical second movie in the series would’ve followed up on the cliffhanger, making Steve’s struggles to adapt to the modern world a major focus. But because “Captain America: The Winter Soldier” happens after “The Avengers,” Steve has already gone through that struggle in a different movie. Instead, “The Winter Soldier” finds him thriving in the 2010s and friends with Natasha Romanoff (Scarlett Johansson), and the audience is expected to know that going in.

This trend only grows more extreme with “Captain America: Civil War,” which is barely a “Captain America” movie so much as an unofficial “Avengers” story. If you’re only watching the “Captain America” movies on their own, this would hardly be a satisfying conclusion to the Steve Rogers trilogy. Things would get even more confusing if you immediately followed the film up with “Captain America: Brave New World,” which would reveal that Steve retired and gave up the Captain America mantle between movies.

Advertisement

Indeed, despite having the same superhero moniker in their titles, all four “Captain America” movies feel strangely disconnected. Not only do they heavily feature characters who were introduced outside the “Captain America” films themselves, but there are very few actors who’ve stuck around throughout the whole journey. In fact, there’s only one character who appears in all four films, and his continued presence is especially surprising, considering what happened to him all the way back in “The First Avenger.”

Bucky Barnes is the only constant throughout the Captain America movies

Characters like Peggy (Hayley Atwell) or Sharon Carter (Emily VanCamp) may come and go, but James Buchanan “Bucky” Barnes (Sebastian Shaw) is here to stay. He’s introduced in “The First Avenger” as Steve’s unflinchingly supportive best friend, both before and after Steve gets swole. And while Bucky holds his own in one of the film’s battles, he gets unlucky during an ambush and falls off a train, plunging down into the Austrian Alps.

Advertisement

This might be a controversial opinion, but I think Bucky is sort of boring in “The First Avenger.” He’s a little too wholesome to be interesting and a little too similar to Steve to feel memorable. That’s why it was a pleasant surprise in “The Winter Soldier” when Bucky returned as a brainwashed superhuman Hydra soldier. Bucky was no longer a goody two-shoes; he was a tortured anti-hero who was only saved because Steve refused to give up on him.

Bucky’s evolution throughout the MCU is slow and steady. By the time “Civil War” picks up, Bucky is still a wildcard and is now being protected almost solely by Steve, as nearly everyone else wants him dead for one sympathetic reason or another. From there, things improve for Bucky over the next few MCU films; by the time he shows up in “Brave New World,” he’s largely back to the reliable, heroic man we met in “The First Avenger.”

Advertisement

There’s an argument to be made that Bucky is the real protagonist of the “Captain America” movies. (Or, at least, he’s the main protagonist of the first three films.) Whereas Steve Rogers is already the ideal leader from start to finish, Bucky is the one constantly forced to change. He’s a man who falls into the depths of Hell and must painstakingly climb his way back out. This arc can’t happen without Steve’s involvement, but that doesn’t change how it’s still Bucky, not Steve, who is going through the more compelling, transformative journey. Bucky is the true heart and soul of the first three “Captain America” films; it makes sense that he’d be the only original character still around for the fourth.

TV & Beyond on 2025-05-05 20:00:00

TV & Beyond on 2025-05-05 20:00:00

by | May 5, 2025 | TV & Beyond Articles

the animated series “Star Trek: Prodigy.”

Trekkies will be able to tell you, however, that Mulgrew was a last-minute replacement. Canadian actor Geneviève Bujold was originally cast as Captain Janeway and was considered quite a “get” at the time, as she possessed a gentle, intense theatricality that the show’s producers felt would add prestige to “Voyager.” In the end, Bujold only worked in front of the cameras for two days before quitting in a huff. Many have seen the leaked footage of Bujold online.

Advertisement

Actor Garrett Wang, who played Harry Kim on “Voyager,” remembered his experience working with Bujold during her very brief stint on the series while appearing on the “Delta Flyers” video series in 2020. Bujold, it seems, confided in Wang when it came to her reasons for departing the show. It appears she simply didn’t trust anyone involved in making “Voyager.”

Geneviève Bujold said she didn’t trust anyone involving in making Voyager

Watching Bujold’s footage, one can see that she might not have worked out. Bujold is a classically trained actor used to working on the stage and in films, having collaborated with notable directors like Alain Resnais, Brian De Palma, and David Cronenberg. She was no stranger to mainstream blockbusters either, having also appeared in films like “Earthquake” and Disney’s “The Last Flight of Noah’s Ark.” She even had a few TV gigs in the 1960s in her native Canada, but had only done TV movies since then. “Voyager,” it seems, was a massive TV production that moved at lightning speed, and Bujold couldn’t catch up.

Advertisement

Wang recalled Bujold being antisocial on the “Voyager” set, often running out of the room in between takes and not doing much interacting with him or any of the show’s other cast members. Curious about her thoughts regarding the series, Wang said he had to intercept one of her evacuations just to ask how things were going. He recounted the following interaction:

“[S]he looks at me and, in her French-Canadian accent, she said, ‘I feel as if I cannot trust anybody.’ And I said, ‘What? You can’t trust anybody?’ ‘Yes, when I first agreed to take the role of Janeway, I tell the producers that I want to have no nonsense with my hair. I want my hair down, I don’t want it up. I don’t want a lot of makeup … I want her to be Captain first and a woman second.'”

Advertisement

It seems that Bujold had spent some time developing Janeway into a character she was comfortable playing, but that the show’s producers had kept changing her looks, altering her hair and makeup to get it “just right.” Bujold hated that so much time was being spent on her character’s appearance, feeling it was interfering with her acting.

Wang remembers Bujold complaining about Voyager’s producers

Wang saw how upset Bujold was, and understood that she felt betrayed. He continued:

“Literally, she was very set about it. ‘This is what I will do. I have a very clear picture about [how] I will be Captain Janeway.’ And then she said the producers agreed. ‘They agreed with me, but then before we start filming, they change everything.’ So, she felt she was kind of given a certain leeway to do what she needed to do [to] prepare herself to be Captain Janeway, and then it was taken away. It was like, ‘Sorry, you can’t do all the things that we agreed to.'” 

Advertisement

An article in TV Guide in 1994 also related a moment when Bujold became angry at an on-set photographer who was seemingly taking photos of her butt without asking. The photographer said he was getting images for a potential Captain Janeway action figure, but the incident made Bujold uncomfortable. She left the set after two work days, after which Mulgrew was called in to take her place. Mulgrew had a lot more TV experience and took to the fast pace right away. Given how often Janeway’s hair changed throughout “Voyager,” she was also clearly okay with whatever the hair-and-makeup department wanted.

Bujold hasn’t worked on a TV series since her involvement with “Voyager.” Her next two movies after that were 1996’s “The Adventures of Pinocchio” and the celebrated 1997 indie film “The House of Yes.” Wang, meanwhile, would later appear on the animated show “Star Trek: Lower Decks,” playing Harry Kim and dozens of his duplicates. They both seem to be doing well.

Advertisement