Sophie Turner Wore A Gorgeous Yellow Dress To A Wedding That Was ‘Giving Major Kate Hudson In How To Lose A Guy In Ten Days’ Energy

Sophie Turner Wore A Gorgeous Yellow Dress To A Wedding That Was ‘Giving Major Kate Hudson In How To Lose A Guy In Ten Days’ Energy

For years, viewers watched Sophie Turner wear medieval attire as part of the cast of Game of Thrones. Of course, the fan-favorite actress (who’s now sporting blonde hair) has a greater sense of style in real life. The Emmy nominee’s latest fashion moment involved her wearing a gorgeous yellow dress to a wedding. With that, a fan said was “giving major Kate Hudson in How to Lose a Guy in Ten Days” vibes, and I can’t disagree.

To quote a Coldplay song, “It was all yellow” at Sophie Turner’s friend’s wedding. While the happy bride dazzled the venue in white, her team of bridesmaids, including Turner, all wore a variety of yellow dresses. Take a look at the gorgeous actress’ Instagram post, which shows her posing with her pals at her friend’s wedding:

New York-set rom-com, Kate Hudson’s character, Andie, wears a butter-yellow silk dress in a scene that sees her and her date, Benjamin, attend a company ball together. If you need a refresher, here’s a photo from the scene in which Andie makes her debut in the memorable ball dress:

Kate Hudson's Andie showing off her yellow-gold dress to Benjamin in How to Lose a Guy in Ten Days.

(Image credit: Paramount Pictures)

The red-carpet-worthy movie gown helps make that scene in How to Lose a Guy in 10 Days (which is streamable with a Paramount+ subscription) very memorable. While Benjamin was originally pursuing Andie all in the name of a bet, one could argue that he truly started to feel for her after seeing her in that gown. (Given that Andie looked like a dream in yellow, how could he not?)

Funny enough, the co-lead lead of the 2003 rom-com, Matthew McConaughey, recreated the movie’s poster alongside his wife, Camila Alves, for their Pantalones Tequila brand. And, as part of that, Alves donned that same yellow dress, and she sported it well.

The sight of Sophie Turner channeling Kate Hudson vibes is just too sweet, and I’m glad this turned out to be something of an unintended homage to a great rom-com. Now, if the wedding reception featured karaoke and Turner sang “You’re So Vain,” then she would have completed her How to Lose a Guy in 10 Days tribute (sans the romantic drama and more celebratory champagne).

TV & Beyond on 2025-07-26 15:41:35

TV & Beyond on 2025-07-26 15:41:35

The Hollywood Reporter. That’s easily Marvel’s biggest opening weekend of the year, surpassing “Captain America: Brave New World” ($88.8 million) and “Thunderbolts” ($74.3 million). 

It’s also the biggest box office debut ever for a “Fantastic Four” movie by a wide margin. Depending on whether or not you adjust for inflation, the franchise record until now was held by 2005’s “Fantastic Four” ($56 million, $92 million adjusted) or 2007’s “Fantastic Four: The Rise of the Silver Surfer” ($58 million, $90 million adjusted). Only 2015’s “Fantastic Four remains undisturbed in the rankings: still dead last with its abysmal $25.6 million debut.

Globally, “First Steps” has already passed the $100 million milestone thanks to $49.2 million in overseas ticket sales. The movie has been warmly received by critics, currently holding a score of 88% on Rotten Tomatoes. Audiences seem to be onboard with it as well, with opening day polling from CinemaScore landing it an A- grade (the same as “Thunderbolts”).

The great Marvel Cinematic Universe merger continues

The title of “The Fantastic Four: First Steps” is primarily a reference to Reed Richards (Pedro Pascal) and Sue Storm’s (Vanessa Kirby) baby, Franklin (Ada Scott), but on a meta level it’s a nod to the Fantastic Four taking their first steps into the Marvel Cinematic Universe. The superhero team was brought under the Marvel Studios umbrella after Disney’s acquisition of 20th Century Fox, which produced the previous “Fantastic Four” movies as well as other Marvel Comics-based franchises like “X-Men” and “Deadpool.”

This isn’t the first test of the big MCU merger. That honor goes to last year’s “Deadpool & Wolverine,” which passed the test with flying colors, grossing more than $1.3 billion worldwide by the end of its run. The best-case scenario for Marvel Studios was that bringing previously off-limits characters into the MCU fold would be a breath of fresh air for the franchise. So far, it seems to be working.

That said, both “Deadpool & Wolverine” and “The Fantastic Four: First Steps” have benefited from being a step removed from the mainstream storyline of the MCU. The former was a meta-comedy that was largely set in a wasteland of multiversal Marvel outcasts, while “First Steps” takes place on Earth-828, in a distant corner of the Marvel multiverse. However, the Fantastic Four’s next MCU adventure will see them bumping elbows with a huge ensemble cast as they team up to take on Robert Downey Jr.’s Doctor Doom in “Avengers: Doomsday.”

I’ve Noticed A Lot Of Stranger Things Fans Are Starting To Have The Same Request About Season 5, And I Couldn’t Agree More

I’ve Noticed A Lot Of Stranger Things Fans Are Starting To Have The Same Request About Season 5, And I Couldn’t Agree More

Last week, we finally got a first taste of Stranger Things Season 5 with a very eventful trailer that is packed full of exciting moments. A first look at the final episodes of the Netflix series has me excited to see the epic conclusion to one of the streaming service’s best properties. However, I can’t stop thinking about one request fans have been talking about more and more lately, because I want it too.

I’m Totally With Fans Calling For The Stranger Things Finale To Go To Theaters

While looking at the online reaction to the Stranger Things Season 5 trailer, I noticed an uptick in fans asking to see the finale in theaters. Take a look:

  • “i would love to watch stranger things in theaters. i can just imagine” – @ttieraam
  • “They should put the final season of Stranger Things in the movie theaters imo” – @jeana_ambrosio
  • “stranger things should’ve just put the series finale in movie theaters” – @carltheswiftie_
  • “If Netflix wants to be smart they would put the series final of stranger things in theaters on new years but they won’t do that because they aren’t as smart as I am” – @jewelpaint
  • “@netflix YOU NEED TO GET STRANGER THINGS 5 IN THEATERS. AT LEAST THE FINALE!!!!!” – @jacobsiroin

While Stranger Things is literally made to watch at home among other 2025 Netflix movie and TV releases, the series has only gotten bigger and more theatrical with each season. As many fans have voiced, it would be amazing to have the option to experience the last emotional episode (set to premiere on Netflix on New Year’s Eve) on the big screen with other Stranger Things fans in a movie theater. It could undoubtedly be a blockbuster affair if the streaming service played their cards right.

called movie theaters “an outdated concept.. Now, Netflix has released some of its movies in theaters before heading to Netflix before, as driven by their filmmakers like Alfonso Cuaron’s Roma and Rian Johnson’s Knives Out sequel Glass Onion getting a week in theaters (and the filmmaker hoping to get the third movie on the big screen, too).

The reason why Netflix movies often don’t come to theaters is because exhibitors are looking for an exclusivity window where audiences can only watch something in theaters, and Netflix has a history of pushing back on that and not giving its titles a real chance in theaters. This is different from other streaming services like Amazon and Apple, which have more successfully compromised with theaters to get their movies on the big screen first. (like the recent release of F1, for example).

Anyway, while I would love to take friends to the movies to see the final moments of Stranger Things, and think it would be a really solid box office success, I think we’re going to have to settle for at-home viewing parties! Volume 1 of the last season premieres on November 26, with Volume 2 heading to Netflix on Christmas Day and the final episode coming out on December 31. So a lot of us will already be around friends and family for the holidays.

TV & Beyond on 2025-07-26 15:00:00

TV & Beyond on 2025-07-26 15:00:00

The New York Times in 2015. He was serving as Fox’s president of domestic distribution and the movie he was referring to was director Josh Trank’s ill-fated, much-maligned “Fantastic Four.” It exists as a textbook example of the phrase “box office bomb.” It was nothing shy of a disaster.

At the time, Fox was still in control of both the “X-Men” and “Fantastic Four” franchises as we were still a couple of years away from Disney swooping in to buy 21st Century Fox in a landmark $71.3 billion deal. The studio had made a reasonably successful “Fantastic Four” movie in 2005, with a panned, far less successful sequel, “The Rise of the Silver Surfer,” following in 2007. Trank was tasked with reviving Marvel’s first family on the big screen.

Despite his good intentions, this would go down as one of the most memorable and important box office flops in superhero movie history.

In this week’s Tales from the Box Office, we’re looking back at “Fantastic Four” ahead of its 10th anniversary and as Marvel’s “The Fantastic Four: First Steps” makes its way to theaters. We’ll go over how the movie came to be, what went down behind the scenes, what happened just ahead of the release, what happened when it hit theaters, and what lessons we can learn from it all these years later. Let’s dig in, shall we?

The movie: Fantastic Four (2015)

Just two years after “Rise of the Silver Surfer,” and one year after the Marvel Cinematic Universe got off to a rousing start with “Iron Man,” reports surfaced in 2009 that Fox was readying a “Fantastic Four” reboot. That same year Fox floundered with the release of “X-Men Origins: Wolverine,” so they were trying to sort out the future of their Marvel properties at a time when superheroes were booming on the big screen.

The project languished in development for several years. Then in 2012, coming off the success of the found footage flick “Chronicle,” Josh Trank was brought on board to direct a reimagining of “Fantastic Four.” He was a director with some big ideas who wanted to do something very different with the characters who were first brought to life in the ’60s by Marvel Comics legends Stan Lee and Jack Kirby.

Trank would go younger with the casting, bringing in Miles Teller (“Whiplash”) as Reed Richards, Kate Mara (“House of Cards”) as Sue Storm, Jamie Bell as Ben Grimm, and Michael B. Jordan (“Fruitvale Station”) as Johnny Storm to lead the cast, with Toby Kebbell (“War Horse”) as Doctor Doom. He was also going to go darker and grittier, citing body horror master David Cronenberg (“The Fly”) as an influence in a pre-release interview:

“I’m a huge David Cronenberg fan, and I always viewed Fantastic Four and the kind of weirdness that happens to these characters and how they’re transformed to really fall in line more with a Cronenberg-ian science fiction tale of something horrible happening to your body and [it] transforming out of control.”

Fantastic Four goes south behind the scenes

With any blockbuster, things will change during development. The studio has ideas, and those ideas might clash with the filmmaker’s creative vision. Such is the way. “Fantastic Four” was no exception, with lots of ideas changing along the way. But there are the normal aches and pains that come along with a $120 million production. Then there’s this.

“Josh and I probably just saw different movies. I was more of an ‘Avengers’ guy and, I don’t want to put words in his mouth, but he was more of a ‘Batman Begins,’ like ultra-grounded, dark and gritty guy,” screenwriter Jeremy Slater explained in a 2025 interview. So, there was very much a vision clash with the two core creatives. Then there’s what was going on behind the scenes between Trank and the studio. 

Post-release reports circulated suggesting that Trank was behaving poorly and on set and was even possibly locked out of the editing room. For his part, the director later denied those claims saying, “None of those facts were true — and any of the facts that were true were spun in such a maliciously wrong way.” Though he did add, “It’s been a challenging movie — for all of the right reasons.”

That truly just scratches the surface and, while specifics are disputed to this day, it was clearly a s***-show. It all came to a head when, just before the release when the buzz was souring, Trank tweeted (then deleted) a takedown of his own superhero blockbuster, which read as follows:

“A year ago I had a fantastic version of this. And it would’ve received great reviews. You’ll probably never see it. That’s reality though.”

Even though the tweet was deleted, the press got hold of it and the damage was done. 

The financial journey

[embedded content]

Fox leaned into the gritty, dark, different nature of the reboot in the marketing. Gritty reboots were all the rage around that time, with everything from “The Dark Knight” to “Skyfall” succeeding greatly using that template. “Fantastic Four” had big problems though, hitting theaters with disastrous reviews. It currently holds an abysmal 9% approval rating on Rotten Tomatoes, one of the worst ever for a Marvel movie of any kind. Dark and gritty did it no favors.

“Fantastic Four” arrived on the weekend of August 7, 2015. Pre-release tracking suggested it would open in the $40 or $50 million range. That’s not great for a superhero movie but this movie would tumble far lower than “not great,” debuting to an absolutely lousy $25.6 million. It remains one of the worst openings ever for a Marvel movie, and didn’t even manage the No. 1 spot in the box office charts. “Mission: Impossible – Rogue Nation” ($28.5 million), then in its second weekend, came out on top.

Bad word of mouth soured the punch, with “Fantastic Four” plummeting 68% for a second weekend take of just $8.1 million. As acclaimed hits like “Straight Outta Compton” arrived, it simply fell off a cliff. Trank’s doomed “Fantastic Four” finished its run with $56.1 million domestically to go with $111.8 million internationally for a grand total of $167.9 million worldwide. That didn’t even come close to covering production and marketing costs.

Depending on how one wants to calculate it, it easily ranks as one of the biggest superhero box office bombs ever, right up there with the likes of “Dark Phoenix” ($246 million worldwide/$200 million budget), “Catwoman” ($82 million worldwide/$100 million budget), and 2023’s “Shazam! Fury of the Gods” ($134 million worldwide/$125 million budget).

The fallout from Fantastic Four was brutal

It’s not quite competing with “The Adventures of Pluto Nash” ($7.1 million worldwide/$100 million budget) for biggest bomb of all time, but this was pretty close to as bad as it gets. That being the case, there was a significant deal of fallout both for Fox and Trank, with the filmmaker taking it in the teeth in the weeks, months, and years that followed.

Trank had been hired to direct a “Star Wars” movie centered on Boba Fett in summer 2014, but he was let go from the project by May 2015. That was a sign of things to come. Multiple reports circulated painting Trank in a negative light and it all but ruined his career. It was bad for Fox, but it was ruinous for Trank, a director who was just getting his feet off the ground. 

In the years since, Trank has only directed one film: 2020’s “Capone,” which starred Tom Hardy. It was met with a muted response. He has a horror movie titled “Send a Scare” in post-production as we speak, but his opportunities have been few and far between over the last decade, to put it lightly.

Fox, amazingly, seemed eager to revisit Reed Richards and the gang. “X-Men” franchise producer Simon Kinberg said they “want to make another Fantastic Four movie” in May 2016, while acknowleding that they “didn’t make a good movie.” In 2017, rumors circulated suggested that a new “kid-friendly” take on “Fantastic Four” was in the works. Just a few months later, though, any plans Fox had would become a moot point.

Fantastic Four was the beginning of the end for Fox’s era of Marvel

By November 2017, it was reported that Disney was looking to buy most of Fox’s media assets. Disney, which owned Marvel Studios and was shattering records with the MCU, desperately wanted the rights to the “X-Men” and “Fantastic Four.” While it would be silly to think Disney spent $71 billion just for that, it was certainly a factor. The other big factor was the oncoming streaming wars.

“What could it mean having access to [Fox’s] library, not to monetize it through traditional means, but to do it through [streaming]?” Disney CEO Bob Iger said to CNBC in 2019 after the deal closed. “Bam! I mean, the light bulb went off.”

The Fox era of Marvel was over. What started with “X-Men” in 2000, which helped kick off the superhero movie boom, was over. “Dark Phoenix” was essentially dumped to theaters in 2019 and Disney inherited “The New Mutants,” dropping it during the pandemic in 2020. That was that. Nearly 20 years and $6 billion at the box office later, and it was all over.

It would be wildly unfair to lay everything that happened at the feet of “Fantastic Four,” but it’s hard not to see this as a beginning to an end. As one of the key unraveling points of the whole enterprise. Fox didn’t just give up on superheroes — they sold the whole damn studio just a few years later. 

The lessons contained within

This article is being published as “The Fantastic Four: First Steps” makes its way to theaters with very solid reviews. Marvel Studios has seemingly worked its magic with the beloved characters who are poised to help the studio get out of a slump brought on by the likes of “Captain America: Brave New World” and “Thunderbolts.” In some ways, that movie’s journey began in 2015 with this trainwreck of a would-be blockbuster.

Trank has tried to have a good attitude about the whole thing, even famously reviewing his own “Fantastic Four” movie on Letterboxd in 2019. But it feels either very telling or radically unfair that he’s hardly been a factor in Hollywood over the last decade. Without first-hand knowledge of what happened, I can’t confidently say which one it is. Either way, it’s f****d up.

What I can say is that a big part of the reason why Fox was so eager to get this movie made is that they had to make a movie every so many years or risk losing the “Fantastic Four” rights. That clock was ticking, so this movie got made. That’s never a good reason to enter into a creative endeavor.

Beyond that, Fox hired Trank and it seemed like he had a pretty specific vision. Did that include a terrible take on Doctor Doom? Was it as bad as what we got? We’ll never know. What we do know, however, is that leaning away from that vision led to unquestionable catastrophe. Setting any alleged bad behavior aside, there’s something to be said about sticking to a vision. I mean, how could it have possibly been any worse?

San Diego Comic-Con 2025: ‘Project Hail Mary’

San Diego Comic-Con 2025: ‘Project Hail Mary’

Ryan Gosling in ‘Project Hail Mary’. Photo: Amazon MGM Studios.

Preview:

  • ‘Project Hail Mary’ touched down at Comic-Con.
  • The panel included Ryan Gosling, Phil Lord and Christopher Miller.
  • The movie adapts Andy Weir’s book.

‘Project Hail Mary’ represents the collaboration between some fairly stellar names in filmmaking. Take directors Phil Lord and Christopher Miller, who have brought acclaimed comedies and Oscar-winning animated superhero movies to screens while having fun with genre.

Add in Ryan Gosling, who has proved his chops in both the dramatic and laugh-grabbing departments. And blend them with the invention of Andy Weir, whose book ‘The Martian’ became a wildly successful movie in its own right.

The result is a space-set adventure that appears to offer plenty of laughs and humanity to go with the big ideas.

Based on Andy Weir’s (The Martian) novel of the same name, Project Hail Mary is an exhilarating space adventure set in the near future. Ryland Grace (Ryan Gosling),… Read the Plot

So the movie was naturally one that Amazon MGM Studios knew could play well at Comic-Con, with the team showing up for a panel in Hall H.

Related Article: Ryan Gosling to Star as an Astronaut in New Thriller ‘Project Hail Mary’

What’s the story of ‘Project Hail Mary’?

Ryan Gosling in 'Project Hail Mary'. Photo: Amazon MGM Studios.

Ryan Gosling in ‘Project Hail Mary’. Photo: Amazon MGM Studios.

‘Project Hail Mary’ is set in the near future. Our hero is Ryland Grace (Gosling), a school teacher-turned-astronaut who wakes up from a coma, alone, on a space station with no memory of who he is or his mission.

His memory returns in bursts and he pieces together that he was sent to the Tau Ceti solar system, 12 light-years from Earth, to reverse the impact of a space event that had already hurled our planet into the early stages of an Ice Age.

As details of the mission unravel, he must call on all of his scientific training and sheer ingenuity, but he might not have to do it alone…

What happened at the ‘Project Hail Mary’ panel?

Ryan Gosling as Ryland Grace in 'Project Hail Mary'.

Ryan Gosling in ‘Project Hail Mary’. Photo: Amazon MGM Studios.

Much as with big movies such as ‘TRON: Ares’, the ‘Project Hail Mary’ team made good use of the giant screens that stretch down the sides of Hall H, projecting logos and the galactic map seen in the trailer.

Those on stage included directors Phil Lord and Christopher Miller, author Andy Weir and screenwriter Drew Goddard (who also adapted ‘The Martian’).

Gosling talked about why he wanted to join the projecting, citing Weir as the greatest science fiction writer (and not just because he was sitting next to him on the panel). He knew it would be great, but not how great.

Here’s what else he said:

“It’s about a scared guy who doesn’t know what he’s doing and I was a scared guy who didn’t know what I was doing, trying to turn it into a movie.”

He called Lord and Miller, which seems like a smart move…

For their part, the directors also used a movie metaphor to describe working with Gosling, in that it’s about collaboration and they had a great time working with the actor.

The filmmakers shared new concept art from the movie, including spaceship designs and more.

Biggest news of the panel? Daniel Pemberton, who has experience working with Lord and Miller on the ‘Spider-Verse’ movies, is the composer for this.

But the best part of the panel? The first five minutes of the movie were shown, including Gosling waking up from an induced coma, befuddled and unsure of where he is. He struggles with a robot that is trying to help him and discovers that the crew in the chamber with him are all dead.

Other clips were shown, but from later in the movie, so we’ll avoid discussing those to stay away from spoilers.

When will ‘Project Hail Mary’ be on screens?

Unlike some of the other projects touted at this year’s convention, we still have a wait for ‘Project Hail Mary’.

Amazon MGM Studios will release the movie in theaters on March 20th, 2026.

Ryan Gosling in 'Project Hail Mary'. Photo: Amazon MGM Studios.

Ryan Gosling in ‘Project Hail Mary’. Photo: Amazon MGM Studios.

Other Movies Similar to ‘Project Hail Mary’:

Buy Ryan Gosling Movies on Amazon